Thailand media must remain free channel of info amid crisis

THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN PRESS ALLIANCE (SEAPA) has expressed grave concern over the imposition of anti-government protesters in Thailand for all six free television stations to stop broadcasting news and information from the government and to air only the side of the opposition.

An alliance of independent media groups in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines — including the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ)– SEAPA in a statement called the opposition’s demand “a grave threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the media guaranteed under the current 2007 Constitution (of Thailand) and in keeping with the country’s international human rights obligations.”

The opposition’s demand aired by protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban — former deputy prime minister of Thailand who faces an arrest warrant for ordering the police crackdown that killed 91 “red shirts” protesters in 2010 — was a direct call for journalists to cast aside “their basic duty to maintain professionalism in order to keep the public constantly informed and channel diverse political views,” SEAPA said.

The statement was released by the SEAPA secretariat based in Bangkok led by executive director Gayathry Venkiteswaran.

The full text of the SEAPA statement follows:

THAILAND MEDIA MUST REMAIN A FREE CHANNEL OF INFORMATION

“SEAPA is deeply disturbed by today’s (Dec. 1, 2013) call by the leader of anti-government protesters Suthep Thaugsuban to all six free television stations to stop broadcasting news and information of the government, but to air only statements made People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) to avoid public confusion over the current political situation.

“We see Suthep’s call as a grave threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the media guaranteed under the current 2007 Constitution and in keeping with the country’s international human rights obligations.

“Suthep is directly calling on the media to turn their backs on their basic duty to maintain professionalism in order to keep the public constantly informed and channel diverse political views. Such duty is crucial in the context of the current political crisis and the extremely fluid situation.

“Suthep’s speech at the Government Complex at 4.30 p.m. was broadcast live on Channels 3, 5, 7 and the Thai Public Broadcasting Service (TPBS). Channel 9 which is a state-owned enterprise reported the address briefly; while Channel 11, which is run by the government’s Public Relation Department aired another program during Suthep’s speech this afternoon.

“The call followed a march of anti-government protesters to all TV stations earlier today to pressure them to relay the signal of the Blue Sky Channel, a pro-Democrat party station broadcasting the protest live.

“Separate negotiations with station executives resulted in some agreeing to give more air time to the BlueSky broadcast. TPBS issued a statement upholding its its professional practice to keep the public informed of news and information from all sides.

“SEAPA supports the joint statement of the Thai Journalists Association (TJA) and Thai Broadcast Journalists Association (TBJA) issued today urging all journalists whether from state or privately-owned media to keep its utmost professionalism in reporting the current political conflict and not to be influenced by any groups.
SEAPA urges both protesters and the government to stop coercing the media to report in their favor. It is already a tremendous challenge, especially for local media who are also citizens, to report fairly during political crises, and keeping all media channels free from interference is the best way for the entire media to fulfill this duty.

“At the same time, SEAPA calls upon all the mainstream and online media to report the situation in a balanced and professional manner and not to provoke the situation or misinform the public. The duty of media in this time of crisis is to faithfully report events as they unfold, in order to keep the public informed and to enable them to act freely according to their conscience. This duty of the media is sworn to the public, and not to media owners or pressure groups of any political persuasion.

“Finally, we call upon all sides to refrain from fomenting hate speech and manufacturing distorted information, which could only do more harm than good to Thailand and its people, whose interests all sides seek to protect and advance.”

————————————
For more information, please contact:
Gayathry Venkiteswaran, Executive Director, gayathry@seapa.org
+66 88 017 4810
Kulachada Chaipipat, Campaigns Manager, kcchacha@gmail.com
+66 81 373 4202

DATA A DAY: Should education get the lion’s share of the budget?

THE 1987 CONSTITUTION states it pretty clearly:

“The State shall assign the highest budgetary priority to education and ensure that teaching will attract and retain its rightful share of the best available talents through adequate remuneration and other means of job satisfaction and fulfillment.”

But things being the way they are, and the Supreme Court being the way it is, does this automatically mean that the Education department must always get the largest appropriation from the yearly budget?

For example, is it possible that the allocation for debt servicing may be larger than the allocation for the Department of Education?

Find out how the Supreme Court decided this question by visiting the PCIJ’s MoneyPolitics Online database, or clicking this direct link.

DATA A DAY: Ano ang K mo?

EVERYBODY HAS HEARD of the K+12 or the K-to-12 law that President Benigno S. Aquino III signed in May this year. But while everyone seems to like talking about the law and the controversy it has generated, it would be good to know just how much we really understand of the K+12 program.

Here’s today’s Data a Day:

On May15, 2013, President Aquino signed into law RA 10533 or the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. This law mandates what?

1. One year preparatory education, 6 years of elementary, 6 years secondary

2. One year preparatory, 7 years elementary, 5 years secondary

3. Two years preparatory, 6 years elementary, 5 years secondary

Just to simplify, is K+12 equal to 1+6+6, 1+7+5, or 2+6+5?

Find out the answer by checking the MoneyPolitics website of the PCIJ here.

 

 

 

Historic step: Citizens, CSOs filing ‘People’s FOI Bill’ today

TODAY, the first day in the life of the 16th Congress, citizens and civil society groups of the Right to Know, Right Now! Coalition take a first step in history — they are filing the People’s Freedom of Information Bill at the House of Representatives.

The bill, signed and endorsed by at least 18 major organizations of government employees, unionized workers, families of migrant workers, youth and students, women, journalists and media workers, and civil society advocates, is a petition for Indirect Initiative that is allowed under Section 3 (b) and Section 11 of Republic Act 6735, or “The Initiative and Referendum Act”.

Copies of the petition and the People’s FOI Bill may be downloaded here:

The People’s FOI Bill – 16th Congress

Petition – Indirect Initiative on FOI

FOI Youth Initiative (FYI) Network Members
       

Atty. Nepomuceno Malaluan, lead convenor of the Right to Know Coalition, Right Now! Coalition, and the petitioners have lined up at the House of Representatives since last Friday, June 29, to be among the first filers of proposed legislation in the House of Representatives.

The Coalition members are No. 26th — but the only citizens’ group — in the queue of eager early filers of bills in the House. All the others in line are lawmakers or staff personnel of lawmakers.

Through their authorized leaders and representatives, the following organizations (known collectively in the bill as the Right to Know, Right Know! Coalition) signed and subscribed to the People’s FOI Bill:

1. PUBLIC SERVICES LABOR INDEPENDENT CONFEDERATION (PSLINK)

2. PHILIPPINE RURAL RECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT (PRRM)

3. NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS OF THE PHILIPPINES (NUJP)

4. FOI YOUTH INITIATIVE (FYI)

5. ALLIANCE OF PROGRESSIVE LABOR (APL)

6. CAUCUS OF DEVELOPMENT NGO NETWORKS (CODE-NGO)

7. SOCIALWATCH PHILIPPINES

8. FOCUS ON THE GLOBAL SOUTH – PHILIPPINES

9. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY NETWORK (TAN)

10. PEACE WOMEN PARTNERS

11. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA)

12. PRUDENTIALIFE WARRIORS PILIPINAS

13. FILIPINO MIGRANT WORKERS GROUP (FMWG)

14. AKSYONG KABAYANIHAN PARA SA ORGANISADONG PAGBABAGO (ANGKOP)

15.CENTER FOR MEDIA FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY (CMFR)

16. ANG KAPATIRAN PARTY

17. ACTION FOR ECONOMIC REFORMS (AER)

18. PHILIPPINE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM (PCIJ)

The People’s FOI Bill Petition was also endorsed by the following concerned citizens: Lorenzo R. Tanada III; Bishop Broderick S. Pabillo, DD; Ana Maria R. Nemenzo; Arthur A. Aguila; Jerome Patrick D. Cruz; and Leah Zorina E. Aguila.

Tanada was the House deputy majority leader in the 15th Congress who had championed he FOI bill over the years.

The Right to Know Coalition will also file a similar People’ FOI Bill and petition for indirect initiative with the Senate in the coming days.

Quick Quiz: Which state schools have most students, graduates?

ARE THEY well worth the taxpayers’ money that government allots them as subsidy? And do they deliver quality, not just quantity?

Which state colleges and universities had the largest number of enrollees and graduates in 2011?

A. University of the Philippines
B. Cagayan State University
C. Bulacan State University
D. Polytechnic University of the Philippines

Take a Quick Quiz in PCIJ’s MoneyPolitics Online!

No cheating, please.