MSNBC Politics

Questions and Answers

Is MSNBC really the place for politics?

Posted by Donald K
jove

I think so. MSNBC panders to Democrat views, but their analysis of political inner workings is very accurate. I find they offer a more honest breakdown of American politics than Fox News, who totally promotes the Republican Party line. (I'm not sure how CNN compares. I stopped watching them because they seem to portray an ignorance of political power plays. They also spend more time on entertainment news than I care for. They seem to be trying to attract more mainstream viewers than the political afficiando types.)

Is MSNBC really "The Place for Politics"?

Posted by John
jove

Rule of Thumb for Politics:

MSNBC – liberal bias

FOX News – conservative bias

The End.

THE LATEST NEWS : NBC's Peter Alexander talks Office Politics

http://www.jovefrancisco.com/politics

ABC News Politics

Questions and Answers

Do people in the U.K. See a lot of news from USA?

In the USA, most of us get our news from a one hour news show. Each channel's program is very much a like. The whole hour will include maybe ten minutes of news about another country(ies). So we get very limited coverage. We can watch some news channels that may include news about other countries, but we have to pay extra.

Do you get more foreign news than us on average? Is it very little about USA? Or any country? Or counrties whose primary language is english?

I ask because at the least, I would like to see more about countries that share my own language.

Is it the same for you? You feel the same?

Posted by English
jove

Oh yes. SO much from america.
And during your elections its blanket- *YAWN*- no offense, but you know how dull that stuff is; imagaine when you cant even vote. Way, way worse!

I agree its interesting to see news from other countries (until recently i read a canadian, several US, 2 aussie, 1 kiwi, and several european newspapers a day) but the media here concentrate on america. Despite the fact that we have close economic and political ties with european countries, we hear comparativly little, compared to the coverage we get from the US~ we get your politics, international, domestic, and showbiz news reported. Even the bbc, which prides itsself on its serious tone, will regularly report on innane holywood tittletattle.
We also had endless coverage in the *lead up* to sandy, and katrina, too, but huge flooding in france or the czech republic will just get a couple of lines on the news, and an ariel shot. An american school shooting will have frequent updates throughout the day, and be discussed for days afterwards on the news, but a comprable event in europe- where such things are far less common- again gets way less coverage.
Canada is almost never mentioned, but we do get the odd aussie thing, but nz is only mentioned when they have a quake.

The presentation style of american tv news is enormously different to ours, from the little ive seen- ABC, CNN. The NY and LA times are reasonably similar to our newspapers, though im entranced by the NYT's writing style, esp its headers.
If you install a tunnel app, you can watch our tv online, and of course read our newspapers whenever. You might also like to try some of our radio-bbc radio is superb- and ad free : )

'from our own correspondant' is a radio show in which reporters around the world report on weird angles on major news stories, or things youve never heard of~ Http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qjlq (2/4 items in the last show are about the US, though this is unusual), and there are loads of more formal shows~ Http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/programmes/g…

i think our tv news varies quite a bit~ sky is slightly sensational, and closest to american news, itv is variable, the bbc not as good as it used to be. The best one is the smallest news provider, channel 4 news. Our provision is different, too, in that, except sky and al jazera, our major channels/shows are all free to air, and very good.

Uk online news~
telegraph~ Http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
guardian~ Http://www.theguardian.com/uk
channel 4 ~ Http://www.channel4.com/news/
bbc~ Http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ and USA specific news~ Http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/World/us_and_canada/

this is the best news show, newsnight~http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mk25 you can find bits on youtube, but will need a tunnel to watch it from the US.
And this is the best political & news satire, i think trialing again in a US version, have i got news for you~ Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm-EZ705m…

btw. Thanks for taking piers morgan. Nice work :P.

Sam Donaldson of ABC News: "GOP Doomed If It Follows Palin, Beck, Rush" Do you agree? Why or why not?

What say you?
Http://www.thefoxnation.com/gop/2009/11/…

Posted by Caribou "QUIT" Barbie™
jove

Yes. Those three do NOT speak for the majority of republicans. I enjoy talking about politics with normal republicans, but those three and their devoted followers aspire to some sort of warped thinking. They need to be purged from politics entirely. They do nothing positive for this country – from the viewpoint of either side.

Crash course in politics?

I want to get into the government and politics more. Can someone tell me what is going on? Everything you know would be great, especially on the goverment, i am already pretty familiar with the politics.
Okay im not just trying to start a fight. Im taking AP Us government next week and want to learn more before i go to school.

Posted by Nicky
jove

Start by forget ABC, CBS and NBC! ,Do your own research, and read, read, read! Do your own research and don't trust the news media for the most part they all have a left leaning agenda! Fox is the only one I would trust, but having said that, again I say do your own research! – Good Luck!

How Politics Actually Works

http://www.jovefrancisco.com/politics

Define Politics

Questions and Answers

Can someone please define "Politics"?

What things would fit into the "politics" catagory in life?
Thanks!

Posted by Thank you God for everythingツ
jove

Politics is the process by which groups of people make decisions that affect others' lives. The term is generally applied to behavior within civil governments, but politics has been observed in all human group interactions, including corporate, academic, and religious institutions.

Politics consists of "social relations involving authority or power"[1] and refers to the regulation of a political unit, [2] and to the methods and tactics used to formulate and apply policy.[3]

Political science (also political studies) is the study of political behavior and examines the acquisition and application of power. Related areas of study include political philosophy, which seeks a rationale for politics and an ethic of public behavior, and public administration, which examines the practices of governance.

Can you define "identity politics"?

I have a pretty stable idea of what it is, but I'm having difficulty putting it into words.

Thanks.

Posted by Crypt (Best #1 Answerer Ever)
jove

Identity politics is political action to advance the interests of members of a group whose members are oppressed by virtue of a shared and marginalized identity (such as race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or neurological wiring).

Who can define politics?

Posted by Bikesh
jove

Im sure most of us know the official definition of politics.

According to wikipedia it is.

Politics (from Greek politikos "of, for, or relating to citizens") as a term is generally applied to the art or science of running governmental or state affairs, including behavior within civil governments, but also applies to institutions, fields, and special interest groups such as the corporate, academic, and religious segments of society. It consists of "social relations involving authority or power" and to the methods and tactics used to formulate and apply policy

My own definition would be a little different.

The of telling Lies while trying to create the illusion that you are telling the truth for the electorate.While doing that you must have an ability to scam, cheat and cream as much money as you possibly can because you don't know if you will be voted for in 5 years time.You must allow the rich and powerful corporations and business to buy your vote for what ever it is they wish.You must be single minded in making the rich richer and the poor poorer and must do anything you can to see the gap between the two increase as much as possible and never reduce.

My perspective is concerning the politics that is going on in the UK and does not necessarily take into account politics that happens in other countries.

Chaplain Overcomes Adversity, Delivers Hope

Bing Politics

Questions and Answers

What are the politics of sugar (beet and cane) ethanol production?

I am doing a project on sugar ethanol, and tomorrow my teacher is just doing the first check to see where we are and some research that we've found. It's a group project, and my two sub-topics are Process/Technology and Political. While I have found one or two useful online articles for the first sub-topic, I haven't really for the political aside (which also includes public opinion of sugar ethanol production). I am NOT asking anyone to give me answers or anything, I would just be very appreciative if anyone could post urls if they find any useful articles for either sub-topic. Please, don't recommend Wiki! And thanks to anyone who can help! =D
Sorry, I just saw an error-political "side", not "aside".

Posted by BeachSweet<3xoxo
jove

Bing.com :)

What is your news source for your politics and/or news?

What is your news source for your politics and/or news? Name 1 news network.

Posted by Kevin
jove

I don't have one news source; wouldn't know much from one source.

RT America
Http://www.youtube.com/user/RTAmerica

Russia Today
Http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday

I like Round Table discussions
Http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play…

Onepointsix.org
Http://www.onepointsix.org/

CNS
Http://www.cnsnews.com/

Politics: Politically Speaking: Is this the WORST "Collateral Damage" in America>?

Obama Drones wars killed over 2,500 "Potential Terrorist" in Pakistan alone. FACT

Not to mention the ones that were "Collateral Damaged" in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, and soon Iran…..not even to mention the 100,000 Civilians in the Nuking of Two Japan Cities. FACT

or the "Collateral Damage" of MILLIONS of Native Americans. FACT
Dam forgot to add the Recend School Shootings in Connecticut. FACT.

Posted by GOD
jove

Notice how liberals never inflict their pompous self-righteousness on crimes like these?

Http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/10616…
The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression is a book authored by several European academics and edited by Stéphane Courtois,[1] which describes a history of repressions, both political and civilian, by Communist states, including genocides, extrajudicial executions, deportations, and artificial famines.
People killed under various communist regimes:
-65 million in the People's Republic of China
-20 million in the Soviet Union[5][page needed]
-2 million in Cambodia
-2 million in North Korea
-1.7 million in Africa
-1.5 million in Afghanistan
-1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe
-1 million in Vietnam[6][page needed]
-150,000 in Latin America
-10,000 deaths "resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power."
—–
A generation ago we’d have had to spend days in a library pouring through dozens of books to learn more about such commands. Who bothered? Maybe a college history major. But today we can do our research on the Internet (non-existent a mere generation ago!) anywhere, any time. We can Bing/Google search “civil wars in the world” and determine where they are being fought. We can then research each civil war and determine who is fighting in them. The results are startling:

-90% of the civil wars in the world involve one combatant-religion — Islam. Muslim extremists fight in China, Russia, Bosnia, Cyprus, Macedonia, Israel, Pakistan, India, Indonesia-Ambon & Halmarhera, Côte d'Ivoire, Kashmir, Algeria, Mauritania, Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kosovo, Bosnia, Kurdistan, Kirghizia, Nigeria, Philippines, Somalia, Turkey, Chechnya, Sudan, Yemen, Thailand, Uganda, Azerbaijan, Mali, Chad, Libya, Bangladesh, East Timor — .

Knowing such facts puts a chilling context on news articles like this:

-3/11/10 Deutsche Presse, Thailand: Muslim separatists have caused 4,000 people to die in clashes, bombings, revenge killings and beheadings in the troubled region, which borders Malaysia. Of the 300,000 Thai Buddhists who lived in the region, 70,000 have left since Muslims started the civil war in 2004.
-8/20/10 AsiaNews, Kashmir: Extremist Muslims are demanding Sikhs convert or leave.
-10/4/11 AFP news, Philippines: Muslims are waging civil war to make a Muslim homeland in Mindanao causing the deaths of an estimated 150,000 people over more than four decades.

There are 2.4 billion Internet users of which 88% are non-Muslims (http://www.internetworldstats.com/) with access to the above information. Many of us are asking ourselves: Is Islam really a religion of peace and tolerance?
———-
But this asker is…well, you know.

The Wind Dont lie. Boston bombing.

http://www.jovefrancisco.com/politics

Aquino for Binay for president in 2016?

Aquino and Binay Cagayan de Oro March 23, 2011There’s a compelling reason for President Aquino to make sure that that he would be able to influence the people’s choice of his successor otherwise he would suffer the same fate that befell the two presidents before him.

His predecessor, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, is in jail – hospital arrest, actually- facing plunder and electoral sabotage charges.
Arroyo’s predecessor, Joseph Estrada, spent six years in detention- much of it under house arrest – for plunder. Convicted, he was later pardoned. He nearly made a comeback as president in 2010, placing second to Aquino. He is now mayor of the city of Manila.

Surely, Aquino knows that in his position, it’s not a matter of good intentions as his “Tuwid na Daan” slogan trumpets. As president, he makes decisions, sometimes resorting to legal brinkmanship. Example is the Disbursement Acceleration Program, the legality of which is being questioned in the Supreme Court.

During his incumbency, a president is immune from suits and can only be removed by impeachment which is initiated by the House of Representatives. Aquino can sleep well that no impeachment against him would succeed because the speaker of the House, Feliciano “Sonny” Belmonte, and Jr is a loyal ally.

The ties that bind Aquino and Belmonte are solid. Belmonte’s city administrator when he was Quezon City mayor is Aquino’s executive secretary – Paquito Ochoa, Jr.

Aquino’s concern, and for that matter all presidents’, is their vulnerability from suits once they are out of Malacañang.
Aquino’s mother, Corazon Aquino, was amply protected because her successor, Fidel Ramos, was her anointed.

Ramos did not have Cory’s advantage because the candidate he endorsed , Lakas-NUCD’s Jose de Venecia, lost to Estrada.
Ramos was investigated by the Estrada administration of involvement in the P7.3-billion Centennial Expo project in Angeles City, Pampanga . ( Ombudsman Aniano Desierto, his appointee, later on dropped him from the list of those being investigated.)
Estrada’s did not have the chance to influence the choice of his successor as he was ousted barely halfway through his six-year term.

PNoy and MarArroyo, who replaced Estrada, acknowledged the support of Ramos and several military generals in the ouster of actor- turned- president- now- mayor. Estrada believed that Ramos did so because of the Centennial Expo Scam.

Arroyo, who was so unpopular by the end of her nine-years in Malacañang, was of no help to the presidential bid of her candidate, Gilbert Teodoro.

It remains to be seen if Aquino’s popularity, undented by his immature leadership especially in times of crisis, would be good enough to make his endorsement valuable by 2016.

It also depends on who he would be endorsing.

Since Aquino is chairman of the Liberal Party, it is expected that he would be supporting the LP candidate for president. Right now, the one being touted as LP bet is Interior Secretary Mar Roxas.

If Roxas runs for president in 2016, Aquino would look ungrateful if he does not endorse him for president considering that Roxas gave up his well-laid out 2010 presidential bid and slid down to be Aquino’s running mate.

But then, will Aquino’s endorsement of Roxas get the latter the presidency? Informed sources said in post-Yolanda surveys, which showed satisfaction rating for Aquino steady despite his bunglings, Roxas’ score dropped substantially.

Aside from Roxas, other LP names being mentioned as possible 2016 standard bearers are Senate President Franklin Drilon and Transportation and Communications Secretary Joseph Emilio “Jun” Abaya. Both are considered lightweights as presidential contenders.

Outside the Liberal Party, there is someone angling for an Aquino endorsement: Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano. That is if he gets past Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos as Nacionalista Party standard bearer.

At the opposite side of the administration party is the United Nationalist Alliance, whose head, Vice President Jejomar Binay, Sr, has not been shy about his 2016 presidential plans.

Binay’s national campaign machinery is formidable, it was able to make his daughter Nancy, a political unknown, win as senator in last year’s election. In many provinces, posters just carried the Binay name without pictures which made people think that they were voting for the vice president for senator.

Would it be possible for Aquino to support Binay for president? Why not? Not openly endorse perhaps but it’s not unthinkable.
After all, there’s a Noy-Bi faction in Malacañang, who includes no less than the immediate members of the President’s family. And Aquino tolerated that in the 2010 elections.