Is sponsorship of FOI bill over? When will plenary debate start?

SCRATCH six days, three more session days to go.

The House of Representatives cut some slack for the Freedom of Information (FOI) bill today, Wednesday, and allowed a third sponsorship speech to be delivered by Ifugao Rep. Teddy Baguilat.

But a fourth sponsorship speech by Rep. Sherwin Tugna of the CIBAC party-list group was merely inserted into the records of the House, after the opposition reportedly blocked its delivery on the floor.

The session ended at 6:13 p.m. without any declaration if the period of sponsorship on the FOI bill is over, and whether interpellation and plenary debates will actually commence on Monday.

A privilege speech not related at all to the FOI bill opened the session. Baguilat’s speech came next, and then a minority lawmaker rose to stop Tugna’s speech.

The session was suspended and resumed a few minutes later.

Thereafter, in express fashion, the House considered several bills of minor importance compared to the FOI bill, including the petition for citizenship of business-risk analyst and newspaper columnist Peter Wallace.

The bills were sponsored, and with no one rising to raise a question, the sponsorship period was closed and the interpellation period for the same bills was opened. The interpellation period was declared closed, and the period of amendments was opened, for the same bills.
Because no one rose again to object or to propose amendments, the same bills were declared approval on second reading.

Quezon Rep. Lorenzo Tanada III was presiding officer, while Rep. Abigail Binay and Rep. Janet Garin took turns as majority leader at today’s session.

Tanada, an author of the FOI bill, and Eastern Samar Rep. Ben Evardone, chair of the House Committee on Public Information, had delivered their sponsorship speeches last MOnday.

Today’s session left two issues hanging though: Is the period of sponsorship of the FOI bill over? Will interpellation and plenary debate start on Monday?

Looks like the lawmakers forgot to settle these matters. Only three session days remain before they take another long recess from Feb. 6 to June 2013. The great majority of them re-electionists or seeking higher office have an election to run, after all.

PH slips 7 pts again in 2013 World Press Freedom Index

The PHILIPPINES did it again — slipped 7 points but this time, in a global index of media freedom and freedom of information.

The country’s ranking in the 2013 World Press Freedom Index dropped in rank from 140 in 2012 to 147 in the latest report that covers 179 nations of the world.

Released today, Wednesday, by Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontieres) the Index placed the Philippines in the “red” zone of nations where the state of media freedom and freedom of information stand significant improvement.

The Philippines came ahead of countries that all, except for Burma, scored lower in the 2013 Index. These are Russia, Singapore, Iraq, Burma, Gambia, Mexico, Turkey, Swaziland, and Azerbaijan that were ranked No. 148 to 156.

However, the Philippines just trailed nations, some newer and weaker democracies, in the latest Index, notably India, Oman, DR Congo, Cambodia, Bangladesh Malaysia, and Palestine that were ranked No. 141 to 146 in the latest Index.

Thailand landed at No. 138, and Indonesia, No. 141, although both had launched their reformasi and democratization movements years after the EDSA people power revolt of 1986 in the Philippines.

In the 2013 Press Freedom Index, Reporters Without Borders said it was publishing for the first time an annual global “indicator” of worldwide media freedom.

“This new analytic tool measures the overall level of freedom of information in the world and the performance of the world’s governments in their entirety as regards this key freedom,” it said.
“In view of the emergence of new technologies and the interdependence of governments and peoples, the freedom to produce and circulate news and information needs to be evaluated at the planetary as well as national level. Today, in 2013, the media freedom “indicator” stands at 3395, a point of reference for the years to come.”

The indicator can also be broken down by region and, it added, “by means of weighting based on the population of each region, can be used to produce a score from zero to 100 in which zero represents total respect for media freedom. This produces a score of 17.5 for Europe, 30.0 for the Americas, 34.3 for Africa, 42.2 for Asia-Pacific and 45.3 for the former Soviet republics.”

However, “despite the Arab springs, the Middle East and North Africa region comes last with 48.5.”

The year 2012 was “the deadliest year ever registered by Reporters Without Borders in its annual roundup,” citing “the high number of journalists and netizens killed in the course of their work.” This factor “naturally had a significant impact on the ranking of the countries where these murders took place, above all Somalia (175th, -11), Syria (176th, 0), Mexico (153rd, -4) and Pakistan (159th, -8).”

Founded in France in 1985 by four journalists, and registered in 1995 as a non-profit organization, Reporters Without Borders has correspondents in 150 countries of the world today.

Its statement of purpose declares that, “freedom of expression and of information will always be the world’s most important freedom.”

On its official website, the group says: “If journalists were not free to report the facts, denounce abuses and alert the public, how would we resist the problem of children-soldiers, defend women’s rights, or preserve our environment? In some countries, torturers stop their atrocious deeds as soon as they are mentioned in the media. In others, corrupt politicians abandon their illegal habits when investigative journalists publish compromising details about their activities. Still elsewhere, massacres are prevented when the international media focuses its attention and cameras on events.”

“Freedom of information is the foundation of any democracy. Yet almost half of the world’s population is still denied it,” it adds.

The 2013 Index did not offer a specific section on the state of media freedom in the Philippines. However, in its 2011-12 Index, Reporters Without Borders ranked the Philippines No. 140 (out of 179 countries surveyed), noting that, “the (Aquino) government that took over in July 2010 has not yet responded effectively to the media’s problems.”

Last year’s Index averred that, “threats and violence against local radio station hosts (including physical attacks and murders) and the culture of impunity represent the biggest obstacles to media freedom.”

Paramilitary groups and privately-owned militias, which were included in the 2011 list of Predators of Press Freedom, “have been implicated in most of the attacks on journalists since democracy was restored in 1986,” the group said. “Corruption facilitates the impunity enjoyed by those responsible for violence against journalists. Politicians maintain links with criminal networks. The judicial system is not sufficiently independent.”

According to the 2012 Index, “difficulty accessing information, self-censorship and journalists’ low pay also pose serious problems for the independence of newspapers, which are often influenced or controlled by powerful business and political interests.”

The group had lamented that, “the trial of 96 people accused of planning and carrying out the 23 November 2009 massacre in Maguindanao province, in which 32 journalists were killed, has been under way for more than a year without anyone being convicted yet.”

Reporters Without Borders also noted the opposition to the right of reply bill pending in Congress that media organizations have called an “act of terrorism against the media,” as well as “the revised criminal code and the witness protection program constitute obstacles to media freedom and give the authorities the power to silence undesired voices.”

In the Philippines, “the environment for journalists is marked by fear and violence,” the 2011-12 report said. “The prevailing impunity, particularly on the island of Mindanao, one of the world’s most dangerous regions for journalists, is holding back the process of improving the media freedom situation and the right to information.”

Last year’s Index stressed that President Aquino had promised during a meeting in August 2010 with the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines to take the “necessary concrete measures” to stop the killings.

House, Session Day 5: Not a soul spoke a word about FOI again

SCRATCH five days, four session days to go.
Not a word was heard or spoken again about the Freedom of Information (FOI) bill at the House of Representatives today, Tuesday.
The session started at past 4 p.m., was marred by intermittent suspensions, and finally ended at 5:20 p.m. Yet again, there was no quorum at the chamber.
The House reverted back to uncanny silence on the FOI even after a brief show of interest in the bill when sponsorship speeches by two lawmakers were allowed on Monday.
Yesterday’s quorum receded back to no-quorum today.
Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. who showed up on Monday, was again a no-show on the floor on Tuesday. Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II, meanwhile, was seen briefly strutting around the session hall.
Cavite Rep. Crispin Remulla Jr. presided over Tuesday’s session that was suspended on and off, until finally it closed with not even an hour spent on official business.
The lawmakers merely breezed through the day. They barely warmed their seats and tackled just the little, light things.
First, they welcomed a delegation of US legislators and their staff who are guests of Belmonte, it was announced. Next, the lawmakers passed a handful of local bills, with the secretariat reading the bills’ titles into the chamber’s records, at formula-one speed.
Without any lawmaker rising to move to suspend the session, the acting majority leader moved to call it a day. By 5:20 p.m., the session was over.
On Monday, Rep. Ben Evardone, chairman of the Committee on Public Information, and Rep. Lorenzo Tanada III, main author of the FOI bill, were at least allowed to deliver their sponsorship speeches.
Two other co-authors, Rep. Teddy Baguilat and Rep.Sherwin Tugna, were prepared to deliver their own sponsorship speeches, but the House minority stomped them.
Is the House’s feigned support for the FOI bill over?
This much is clear: On Tuesday at the chamber, not a soul spoke a word about the FOI bill again.

House finally tackles FOI, but bill still hangs in the balance

206_6374

FINALLY, but hopefully not belatedly, the House of Representatives began tackling the long-delayed Freedom of Information (FOI) bill on the House floor, as the House leadership allowed the bill’s authors to sponsor the measure in plenary on Monday.

The bill however still hangs precariously in the balance, with only five more session days before legislators go on an extended election campaign break beginning Feb. 8. The 15th Congress only resumes session for three days in June to wrap up its proceedings and welcome the entry of the 16th Congress.

House committee on public information chairman Ben Evardone delivered the sponsorship speech Monday late afternoon, even as FOI advocates marched to Malacanang to ask President Benigno S. Aquino III to certify the bill as urgent.

Members of the Right to Know Right Now! Coalition said the FOI bill was now in the “intensive care unit” and needing resuscitation by Malacanang through a certification as urgent. This is because the group believes that only an outright endorsement by the President could allow the bill to get to the finish line before Congress adjourns.

The bill had slept for almost a year in the committee level before finally squeezing past the committee late November last year. The bill had been opposed by several legislators who insist that the Philippine media was already too powerful as to be abusive. Proponents of the FOI in turn insist that the bill is for the benefit of every citizen, and not just the media.

Despite repeated calls for Congress to prioritize the measure, the House leadership appeared uncommitted. Two days were lost last week after Davao Sur Rep. Marc Douglas Cagas threatened to question the presence of a quorum in his bid to block a law that creates the new province of Davao Occidental. On Monday, there were more than a hundred Congressmen who came to the session floor, enough to be considered a quorum.

At the same the President Aquino himself had refused to commit himself with an outright endorsement of the measure, saying that it was up to the Congress plenary to act on the bill.

No commitments from Palace on FOI


IN THE END, it will be a waiting game.

With FOI advocates rattling the gates of Malacanang for a Presidential certification of the Freedom of Information bill as urgent, Presidential Communications Undersecretary Manuel Quezon III said the Palace can make no commitments on the pending bill in Congress.

Quezon met a delegation from the Right to Know Right Now! Coalition that marched to Mendiola bridge to press the President to make a stronger push for the passage of the measure. The coalition is asking for a Presidential certification of the measure as urgent to save the bill from dying from inaction in the 15th Congress. There are only six more session days left before Congressmen go on an extended election campaign break on Feb. 8.

The delegation told Quezon that the President could make the measure move faster in the lower chamber if only he asks his allies in Congress to give it priority.

Quezon for his part said that the President had already been informed by Speaker Feliciano Belmonte that he had asked all Congressmen to attend the remaining session days so that pending bills could still be passed.

However, delegation members pointed out that it was in fact this failure of Congressmen to attend sessions that imperiled the FOI to begin with. Congress practically wasted two session days last week when Davao Sur Rep. Marc Douglas Cagas IV threatened to question the presence of a quorum on the floor in his bid to block a law creating the new province of Davao Occidental. Barely fifty Congressmen were in attendance during the session last week.

In fact, FOI proponents in Congress conceded that the bill could have stood a fighting chance of passing in Congress if only there were enough legislators in attendance to render Cagas’ threat moot and academic.

Quezon assured the delegation that he will bring the matter up with the President himself. Right to Know Right Now lead convenor Nepomuceno Malaluan told Quezon that the coalition will wait for the President’s response.