Philippines and progress: Same old, same old?

by Cong B. Corrales

HAVE YOU FELT IT? Are you better off today than in the past years?

“Unsa man ni nga tuwid nga daan? Nga batsi man diay kaayo (What kind of a righteous path is this? It is so full of potholes),” Lourderico Pedimonte, 37 years old and a father of three lamented in a phone interview, Wednesday, when asked if he felt any improvement in his income because of the the country’s supposed unprecedented economic growth.

Pedimonte, who lives in Barangay Consolacion, Cagayan de Oro City in Mindanao, has been a tricycle driver for eight years. From 7:00am to 6:00pm, Pedimonte said his tricycle consumes five liters of premium gasoline, which currently costs P57.10 a liter. His daily rental or “boundary” is P230.

“Even with the increase of the regular fare to P7.00, its still hard to catch up so I could bring home a less than decent earning for the day,” Pedimonte pined in the dialect. “We should–in our own ways–make government hear our demands,” he added.

Here in Metro Manila, Lina Mendoza of Scout De Guia St., Quezon City said she has not felt the economic growth that the national government has been bannering in the news.

Hirap na hirap pa rin kami (We are still in dire straits),” Mendoza—an ambulant food vendor for five years—said in an interview, Wednesday. Mendoza, who used to be a factory worker before getting married, claims she has yet to see an improvement of their plight.

While the Palace boasts of the supposed unprecedented upgrading of the country’s credit rating to “BBB-” by Fitch Ratings, last month—one of the world’s three major credit rating firms—and the pronouncement, during the Philippines Development Forum in Davao City, of no less than the World Bank Country Director Motoo Konishi, earlier this year, that the country “is no longer the sick man of East Asia, but the rising tiger,” Jillian Keenanmay of the online news wires service The Atlantic paints the opposite.

In her May 7 article “The Grim Reality Behind the Philippines’ Economic Growth,” Keenanmay posited that the economic growth only looks great “on paper” and that the “income inequality and unbalanced concentrations of wealth are extreme” in the country. “The economic boom appears to have only benefited a tiny minority of elite families; meanwhile, a huge segment of citizens remain vulnerable to poverty, malnutrition, and other grim development indicators that belie the country’s apparent growth.

Despite the stated goal of President Aquino’s Philippine Development Plan to oversee a period of “inclusive growth,” income inequality in the Philippines continues to stand out,” Keenanmay’s article reads. The current Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate—at 6.6 per cent—is the highest in Asia, second only to China. Keenanmay attributes this growth rate, in part, to the fact that the “Philippines has the youngest population in East Asia, which translates into lower costs to support a younger workforce and less economic drag from retirees.”

Also, for the first time in its history, the World Economic Forum moved the country’s global competitiveness ranking up ten points. “These economic improvements are in part due to President Benigno Aquino, whose steps to increase transparency and address corruption sparked renewed international confidence in the Filipino economy even during the global slowdown,” said Keenanmay. In Forbes Asia’s 2012 report showed the “collective wealth of the 40 richest Filipino families grew US$ 13 billion during the 2010-2011 year, to US$47.4 billion—an increase of 37.9 per cent,” she cited. According to the records of the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE), the combined net incomes of listed firms grew from Php 319.97 billion in January to September 2011 to Php 377.12 billion in the same period this year.

“Meanwhile, overall national poverty statistics remain bleak: 32 percent of children under age five suffer from moderate to severe stunting due to malnutrition, according to UNICEF, and roughly 60 percent of Filipinos die without ever having seen a health care professional,” wrote Keenanmay. Citing the latest report of the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) that there have been no statistical improvements in national poverty levels since 2006 until the first half of last year, Keenanmay observed that “even relative to its regional neighbors, the Philippine’ income inequality and unbalanced concentrations of wealth are extreme.”

MoneyPolitics Quick Quiz # 2

READY KA NA BA?

Here’s MoneyPolitics Online’s Quick Quiz #2:

What is the maximum amount of campaign contributions that a candidate for senator may receive?

a.  P250 million
b.  P500 million
c.  P750 million
d.  None of the above

The answer is quite simple really, but no, we are not giving it away just like that. To find out if you know your elections (and the answer to this quiz), just click this link.

So you think you know elections? Take the MoneyPolitics Quick Quiz

MOST OF US are probably veterans of elections, that event that pundits like to call the favorite past-time of Filipinos, in the league of fiestas and siestas. But how much we really know about Philippine elections will show just how serious we are about the process.

The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism’s MoneyPolitics Online offers Quick Quizzes, little bits and pieces of election information to test just how much we know about that political exercise that visits us every three years.

Quick Quiz No. 1

True of False:

The May 2010 elections marked the first-ever automated elections in Philippine history.

The answer to that quiz may be found here.

Try to answer the question first on your own before taking a peek. No cheating!

More quizzes to come in our countdown to election day.

 

 

MoneyPolitics is about ‘making sense of the truth’

The following is feedback sent by Ariel Sebellino, Executive Director of the Philippine Press Institute (PPI), the national association of newspapers in the country, following the launch of the MoneyPolitics website by the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) last April 26. The MoneyPolitics site aggregates the documents and databases collected by the PCIJ over the last 24 years on public finance records, statements of assets liabilities and net worth, election spending and donation reports, civil works contracts, and socio-economic statistics in the Philippines. The MoneyPolitics website may be accessed here.

IT WAS SO EASY looking at it. In fact navigating through it is a no-brainer. At face value, it comes across as another investigation and scrutiny of the monies of the powers-that-be — or the lingering and pervasive corruption in Philippine politics — in numbers and innumerable data.

I, for one, am amazed with how everything was put together seamlessly by the PCIJ to bring to the fore its most ambitious project to date — MoneyPolitics Online. Culling voluminous documents from way back and converting them into data sheets through scraping and scripting, details of otherwise hard-to-understand SALNs are churned out for easy reading and comprehension.

A product of tedious and committed effort to say the least, MoneyPolitics delves into the realm and dynamics of governance and spending. Take for example the pork shares of the Representatives. Data are presented to show how these were spent and what kinds of projects were funded. Without prejudice, it enables the reader to make an insightful conclusion on how worthless some expenditures were and question how their constituents benefitted from them.

For journalists and and media practitioners in general, it is a dependable reference to reinforce writing (not limited to investigative journalism) that is wanting in substantive numerical data to essentially illustrate, say the correlation between how an elected government official governs and how the people’s taxes are utilized truthfully.

During its initial presentation by the PCIJ, I asked about other data that may not have been included because it seemed to me every bit of information about local and national governance is already there. According to the people behind it, “it is a work in progress”.

At the end of the day, it is teaching me. It gives me the tool to understand how much of governance and public service have something to do with transparency and accountability — and making sense of the truth that should allow me to make informed decisions for a better quality of life.

Where do they stand? Senate candidates on campaign finance


Money and Politics in the 2013 Elections

CAMPAIGN FINANCE HAS ALWAYS been a ticklish subject for many, one often avoided by many a candidate and a voter. And why not? Many complain that they would rather avoid dealing with numbers; politics is complicated enough without having to do math as well.

Yet campaign finance has become one of the leading issues of the 2010 and 2013 elections, as the public and the media learn to slowly look beyond the rhetoric and peek at the numbers. How much are candidates willing to spend to bag a position, and where do they get their funding? Where do they stand on issues like the pork barrel.

Do you know where the senatorial candidates stand on the issue of campaign finance? In this series of brief interviews done by PCIJ’s research section with many of the senatorial candidates, we look at some of the basic issues of campaign finance and what we can expect from these senatorial hopefuls if they do get elected into the upper chamber.


Baldomero Falcone


Christian Seneres


Eddie Villanueva


Greco Belgica


Marwil Llasos


Ramon Montano


Ricardo Penson


Rizalito David


Samson Alcantara


Teddy Casino


Bam Aquino


Chiz Escudero


Cynthia Villar


Margarita Cojuangco


Miguel Zubiri


Gringo Honasan


Koko Pimentel


Risa Hontiveros


Grace Poe