Maguindanao Year 4: PCIJ docus on media murders in campus tour

UPD-Nov15 (5)

IN COMMEMORATION of the fourth anniversary of the Ampatuan massacre, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), together with other media organizations such as the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) and the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP), has been holding a series of documentary screenings in various colleges and universities.

On November 15, the PCIJ partnered with the Journalism Club of the University of the Philippines – Diliman for the first leg of the campus roadshow. About forty to fifty students – a mix of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors – attended the activity, which showcased the PCIJ documentary “Angkan Inc.”. The documentary features the clans of Maguindanao and the dynamics of history, culture, tradition, and politics in the province that gave rise to influential political families such as the Ampatuan clan, whose patriarch has been tagged as the mastermind in the 2009 Maguindanao Massacre where 58 people, including 32 journalists, were murdered.

The Angkan, Inc. documentary was produced by the PCIJ with assistance from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

UPD-Nov15 (3) UPD-Nov15 (6) UPD-Nov15 (2) UPD-Nov15 (1) UPD-Nov15 (4)

 

The second leg of the campus roadshow was held at the Centro Escolar University last November 18, where about a hundred Mass Communication students attended. PCIJ Multimedia Director Ed Lingao served as the main speaker for the activity. He presented PCIJ documentaries on media killings and the culture of impunity. Among the cases discussed were the killings of Marlyn Esperat, the first journalist to expose the P700 million fertilizer fund scam where former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo was implicated, and Palawan environmental broadcaster Gerry Ortega.

CEU-Nov18 (4) CEU-Nov18 (5) CEU-Nov18 (3) CEU-Nov18 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The third leg was held at the University of the Philippines – Los Banos last November 19. The documentary showing and discussion were attended not only by UPLB students, but also by high school and college students from nearby towns and cities. With theme,”Clan Feuds and the Press: Maguindanao Massacre Four Years After” , the forum featured the Angkan Inc. documentary and discussions from FFFJ Legal Counsel Atty. Prima Jesusa Quinsayas and Ed Lingao.

UPLB-Nov19 (4) UPLB-Nov19 (3) UPLB-Nov19 (1) UPLB-Nov19 (5)

Maguindanao Massacre, Year 4: 23 murders in 40 months of PNoy

THE NATION marks tomorrow, Nov. 23, the fourth anniversary of the Maguindanao Massacre, where 32 journalists were killed in the worst single-day act of violence against the media ever recorded in history.

In part to honor the memory of the massacre victims, human rights and media groups across the world will also mark the day as the “International Day to End Impunity.”

But 40 months after President Benigno S. Aquino III promised to end the reign of extrajudicial killings that he had inherited from the Arroyo administration, the Philippines remains one of the deadliest places in the world for journalists, and ranks No. 3 in the “Global Impunity Index.”

The son of a former president who was widowed when her husband, a prominent opposition leader, was assassinated, President Aquino came to power with high expectations that he would act with dispatch and resolve on the unsolved murders of activists, lawyers, church workers, and journalists.

He himself promised as much — and more. In his first State of the Nation Address or SONA, he vowed that his administration would work to usher in an era of “swift justice.”

Kapayapaan at katahimikan po ang pundasyon ng kaunlaran (Peace and order are the foundations of progress),” Aquino said in his first SONA. “Habang nagpapapatuloy ang barilan, patuloy din ang pagkakagapos natin sa kahirapan (So long as there is gunfire, so too will we continue to be impoverished).”

Aquino did busy himself trying to address the country’s economic woes. In the first half of his term, Aquino and his economic managers assiduously sought and in time earned the Philippines unanimous upgrades from the world’s most creditable ratings agencies, notably Fitch, Moody’s, Standard & Poor.

Parallel to that, however, were the country’s lower and lower scores from the world’s most creditable human rights monitoring agencies — in large measure because of the rising numbers of media murders, and the slow, tepid results of official action on the cases.

Under Aquino, the Philippines has scored steadily dipping ratings in recent years from international groups monitoring the state of human rights, media freedom, and freedom of expression such as the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Amnesty International, Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Asia, and the Southeast Asian Press Alliance.

In fact, during Aquino’s first 40 months in office, from July 2010 to October 2013, at least 23 journalists were killed, among them 16 radio broadcasters and seven print journalists.

It is a trail of blood redder, thicker, and worse compared to the number of work-related media murders per year under four other presidents before him, including his late mother Corazon ‘Cory’ C. Aquino and his immediate predecessor Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

Read PCIJ’s latest report, 23 journalists killed in 40 months of PNoy, worst case load since ’86

Maguindanao, media murder docus on 4th anniv of Maguindanao Massacre

IN TEN DAYS, the world again commemorates the Maguindanao Massacre, the single worst case of media murders in the world and the worst case of election violence in the Philippines.

On November 23, 2009, armed men believed to be supporters of the powerful and influential Ampatuan clan murdered 58 people, including 32 journalists, on a remote hillside in Barangay Salman, Ampatuan town. Many of the victims were part of a convoy that was supposed to file the election papers of now Maguindanao Governor Esmael Mangudadatu, a challenger to the Ampatuan’s hold over the province. The media men were there to cover the event.

Media groups such as the National Union of Journalists of the Philippines and the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists have scheduled a variety of activities since the start of the month in order to commemorate the massacre, and remind government of its commitment to find justice for the victims of all media murders.

ANGKAN

On Thursday, November 14, the PCIJ will hold a film showing of its documentary Angkan, Inc., a comprehensive and powerful study of the clans of Maguindanao and how democracy in the province has been overpowered and manipulated by both the clan system and the system of national and local patronage.

The documentary, first aired on TV5′s Balwarte program before the 2013 elections, will be shown at the University of the Philippines College of Mass Communications’ Philippine Star room at 3:30 p.m. This will be followed by a discussion of the major issues raised in the documentary, particularly the continued influence of the political clans, not just in Maguindanao, but in other parts of the country.

There will be screenings of other PCIJ documentaries related to media murders in other schools such as the Centro Escolar University (November 18), UP Los Banos (Nov. 19), University of the East (Nov. 21), and Letran (Nov. 25). The public is invited to attend these free film showings and participate in the discussions.

UPLB

 

DATA A DAY: Immunity for state witnesses

WITH SO MANY pork barrel whistleblowers coming out of the woodwork to spill the beans on their bosses, it may be good for them to know just how much immunity they can get for their testimony.

By their very nature, state witnesses are supposed to be given immunity from prosecution; however, that immunity is not necessarily absolute. At the same time, those who want to turn state witness have to meet certain qualifications.

In other words, just having some juicy beans to spill is not enough to qualify anyone for the Witness Protection Program.

For today’s Data a Day:

True or False: A person, who is admitted to the state’s Witness Protection Program, is exempted from prosecution for contempt or perjury while testifying for the state.

For the answer to that question, check out the PCIJ’s MoneyPolitics Online website, or go to this direct link here.

 

DATA A DAY: Protecting witnesses

IT HAS BEEN SAID that the manner by which the government fails to protect witnesses who are vital to the solution of grave crimes is already a crime in itself. The Witness Protection Program (WPP) is in such a serious need of both support and reform that many witnesses would rather live outside the program’s supposed shelter.

With such a sorry state of affairs, it is already amazing that some people actually agree to become state witnesses.

But are all witnesses qualified for coverage under the WPP?

For today’s Data a Day:

True or False: Anyone who has witnessed a crime and is about to testify before an investigating agency may be admitted into the Witness Protection Program of the Department of Justice.

For the answer to that question, and to understand better what the WPP is all about, just click this link, or go to the PCIJ’s MoneyPolitics Online website here.