‘States must protect journalists’


video by Kat Raymundo/editing by Cong Corrales

SOME POLITICIANS may be averse to this idea, but all states have a responsibility to protect journalists, not because they belong to a special class, but because they have a special role in any democracy.

This was the declaration of United Nations Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression Frank La Rue during the Asia Regional Consultation on Freedom of Expression and Civil Liberties in Bangkok last week.

Speaking before civil society and media leaders from all over the region, La Rue emphasized that journalists have a key role in a democracy that must be protected by the state.

“There is a special responsibility of the state to protect journalists,” La Rue said. “It is not that journalists have different standards of human rights that anyone else. What the state is protecting is the role of the journalist. The Press is one of the fundamental elements to keep society informed so we can all exercise the right to freedom of information.”

La Rue said he has submitted a report to the United Nations stating that all states are obliged to provide at least three kinds of protection for journalists.

First, La Rue said, there must be “an emergency mechanism for physical protection” for journalists. Second is legal protection through the “abolition of all legal obstacles” against journalists. This may be done by decriminalizing slander, libel, “and other criminal forms of legal harassment.”

Lastly, La Rue emphasized the need for “a political element of protection.”

“Higher levels of government should make statements on how important is the role of the press and media to a democratic society,” La Rue said.

 

Thailand media must remain free channel of info amid crisis

THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN PRESS ALLIANCE (SEAPA) has expressed grave concern over the imposition of anti-government protesters in Thailand for all six free television stations to stop broadcasting news and information from the government and to air only the side of the opposition.

An alliance of independent media groups in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines — including the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ)– SEAPA in a statement called the opposition’s demand “a grave threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the media guaranteed under the current 2007 Constitution (of Thailand) and in keeping with the country’s international human rights obligations.”

The opposition’s demand aired by protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban — former deputy prime minister of Thailand who faces an arrest warrant for ordering the police crackdown that killed 91 “red shirts” protesters in 2010 — was a direct call for journalists to cast aside “their basic duty to maintain professionalism in order to keep the public constantly informed and channel diverse political views,” SEAPA said.

The statement was released by the SEAPA secretariat based in Bangkok led by executive director Gayathry Venkiteswaran.

The full text of the SEAPA statement follows:

THAILAND MEDIA MUST REMAIN A FREE CHANNEL OF INFORMATION

“SEAPA is deeply disturbed by today’s (Dec. 1, 2013) call by the leader of anti-government protesters Suthep Thaugsuban to all six free television stations to stop broadcasting news and information of the government, but to air only statements made People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) to avoid public confusion over the current political situation.

“We see Suthep’s call as a grave threat to freedom of speech and freedom of the media guaranteed under the current 2007 Constitution and in keeping with the country’s international human rights obligations.

“Suthep is directly calling on the media to turn their backs on their basic duty to maintain professionalism in order to keep the public constantly informed and channel diverse political views. Such duty is crucial in the context of the current political crisis and the extremely fluid situation.

“Suthep’s speech at the Government Complex at 4.30 p.m. was broadcast live on Channels 3, 5, 7 and the Thai Public Broadcasting Service (TPBS). Channel 9 which is a state-owned enterprise reported the address briefly; while Channel 11, which is run by the government’s Public Relation Department aired another program during Suthep’s speech this afternoon.

“The call followed a march of anti-government protesters to all TV stations earlier today to pressure them to relay the signal of the Blue Sky Channel, a pro-Democrat party station broadcasting the protest live.

“Separate negotiations with station executives resulted in some agreeing to give more air time to the BlueSky broadcast. TPBS issued a statement upholding its its professional practice to keep the public informed of news and information from all sides.

“SEAPA supports the joint statement of the Thai Journalists Association (TJA) and Thai Broadcast Journalists Association (TBJA) issued today urging all journalists whether from state or privately-owned media to keep its utmost professionalism in reporting the current political conflict and not to be influenced by any groups.
SEAPA urges both protesters and the government to stop coercing the media to report in their favor. It is already a tremendous challenge, especially for local media who are also citizens, to report fairly during political crises, and keeping all media channels free from interference is the best way for the entire media to fulfill this duty.

“At the same time, SEAPA calls upon all the mainstream and online media to report the situation in a balanced and professional manner and not to provoke the situation or misinform the public. The duty of media in this time of crisis is to faithfully report events as they unfold, in order to keep the public informed and to enable them to act freely according to their conscience. This duty of the media is sworn to the public, and not to media owners or pressure groups of any political persuasion.

“Finally, we call upon all sides to refrain from fomenting hate speech and manufacturing distorted information, which could only do more harm than good to Thailand and its people, whose interests all sides seek to protect and advance.”

————————————
For more information, please contact:
Gayathry Venkiteswaran, Executive Director, gayathry@seapa.org
+66 88 017 4810
Kulachada Chaipipat, Campaigns Manager, kcchacha@gmail.com
+66 81 373 4202

UN passes resolution on safety of journos, sans push from ASEAN

THE THIRD COMMITTEE of the United Nations General Assembly on November 26 passed a resolution on the safety or journalists and the issue of impunity, among others setting 2 November as the “International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists.”

The resolution was approved without vote by the UN’s Committee for Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Affairs Committee (SOCHUM), one of six main committees of the international body, which is also called the “Third Committee”, according to a press statement of the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA).

The resolution, one of 19 passed by the Third Committee on Tuesday, takes off from previous resolutions by various UN bodies to protect the work of journalists, including a resolution by the Human Rights Council and a joint plan of action by different UN bodies, both approved in 2012.

Previously, the International Day to End Impunity (IDEI) was commemorated annually by freedom of expression advocates on November 23 to mark the anniversary of the 2009 Ampatuan massacre, during which 58 persons were brutally murdered, including 32 media workers — the most horrific act of journalist killings globally.

“It would have been more meaningful if November 23 was chosen as the official IDEI date since it would underline the urgency of the problem of violence against journalists and impunity of perpetrators,” said Gayathry Venkiteswaran, executive director of SEAPA.

“Still, having an official day means we can join governments in commemorating the date, and especially in working together to address this serious problem of impunity,” Gayathry added.

“It is still symbolic that the UN General Assembly passed the resolution almost immediately after we commemorated the IDEI,” she noted further.

Gayathry expressed concerned that “not one country in Southeast Asia co-sponsored the resolution even though it is a problem throughout the region.”

Co-sponsoring the resolution “would have demonstrated the ASEAN member governments’ acknowledgement that the problem exists, and would have been a sign of their commitment to address the culture of impunity in the region,” Gayathry explained.

“For three years now, we have been campaigning on the issue of impunity in Southeast Asia but have received nothing more than polite acknowledgement from government representatives,” said Kulachada Chaipipat, SEAPA campaign manager.

Media freedom groups have been pressuring their respective governments for justice in the numerous cases of impunity killings, but little progress has been made in terms of investigations and prosecutions.

“Governments in the region have been in denial about impunity,” Kulachada said.

For example, the Philippines Communications Secretary, said in a 22 November press briefing that journalists killings were “not so serious”, if one did not consider the Ampatuan massacre.

“But the Philippines was the only country in Southeast Asia where journalists were killed in 2013 — and there were at least six,” Kulachada said.

SEAPA member, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) noted that the case backlog of journalist murders is at a highest point during the term of President Benigno Aquino, with 23 killings recorded.

If the Ampatuan massacre is not counted, “there are now more journalists killed per year on average under Aquino” than any other president after 1986, noted the PCIJ.

The bigger problem is that most cases remain unsolved, including the 2012 killing of Cambodian journalist Heng Serei Oudom, after the court dismissed in August 2013 the case against the primary suspects for lack of evidence.

Founded in 1998, SEAPA is an alliance of independent media organizations in the region, with a secretariat based in Bangkok.

Its members are the Thai Journalists Association, the Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) and the Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI) of Indonesia, the Center for Independent Journalism of Malaysia, and from the Philippines, the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) and PCIJ.

UN passes resolution on safety of journos, sans push from ASEAN

THE THIRD COMMITTEE of the United Nations General Assembly on November 26 passed a resolution on the safety or journalists and the issue of impunity, among others setting 2 November as the “International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists.”

The resolution was approved without vote by the UN’s Committee for Social, Humanitarian and Cultural Affairs Committee (SOCHUM), one of six main committees of the international body, which is also called the “Third Committee”, according to a press statement of the Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA).

The resolution, one of 19 passed by the Third Committee on Tuesday, takes off from previous resolutions by various UN bodies to protect the work of journalists, including a resolution by the Human Rights Council and a joint plan of action by different UN bodies, both approved in 2012.

Previously, the International Day to End Impunity (IDEI) was commemorated annually by freedom of expression advocates on November 23 to mark the anniversary of the 2009 Ampatuan massacre, during which 58 persons were brutally murdered, including 32 media workers — the most horrific act of journalist killings globally.

“It would have been more meaningful if November 23 was chosen as the official IDEI date since it would underline the urgency of the problem of violence against journalists and impunity of perpetrators,” said Gayathry Venkiteswaran, executive director of SEAPA.

“Still, having an official day means we can join governments in commemorating the date, and especially in working together to address this serious problem of impunity,” Gayathry added.

“It is still symbolic that the UN General Assembly passed the resolution almost immediately after we commemorated the IDEI,” she noted further.

Gayathry expressed concerned that “not one country in Southeast Asia co-sponsored the resolution even though it is a problem throughout the region.”

Co-sponsoring the resolution “would have demonstrated the ASEAN member governments’ acknowledgement that the problem exists, and would have been a sign of their commitment to address the culture of impunity in the region,” Gayathry explained.

“For three years now, we have been campaigning on the issue of impunity in Southeast Asia but have received nothing more than polite acknowledgement from government representatives,” said Kulachada Chaipipat, SEAPA campaign manager.

Media freedom groups have been pressuring their respective governments for justice in the numerous cases of impunity killings, but little progress has been made in terms of investigations and prosecutions.

“Governments in the region have been in denial about impunity,” Kulachada said.

For example, the Philippines Communications Secretary, said in a 22 November press briefing that journalists killings were “not so serious”, if one did not consider the Ampatuan massacre.

“But the Philippines was the only country in Southeast Asia where journalists were killed in 2013 — and there were at least six,” Kulachada said.

SEAPA member, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) noted that the case backlog of journalist murders is at a highest point during the term of President Benigno Aquino, with 23 killings recorded.

If the Ampatuan massacre is not counted, “there are now more journalists killed per year on average under Aquino” than any other president after 1986, noted the PCIJ.

The bigger problem is that most cases remain unsolved, including the 2012 killing of Cambodian journalist Heng Serei Oudom, after the court dismissed in August 2013 the case against the primary suspects for lack of evidence.

Founded in 1998, SEAPA is an alliance of independent media organizations in the region, with a secretariat based in Bangkok.

Its members are the Thai Journalists Association, the Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) and the Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI) of Indonesia, the Center for Independent Journalism of Malaysia, and from the Philippines, the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR) and PCIJ.

‘Impunity biggest cause of violence vs journalists’

EACH UNRESOLVED CASE of violence against journalists is an open invitation for even more violence.

This was the message – and the reminder – of United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression Frank La Rue to the Philippines on the 4th anniversary of the Maguindanao Massacre, where 58 people including 32 mediamen were murdered in November 2009.

La Rue was interviewed during the Asia Regional Consultation on Freedom of Expression and Civil Liberties in Bangkok last week.

La Rue also expressed his solidarity with Filipino journalists in the fight to end the culture of impunity in the country.

La Rue–who was in Manila for the first anniversary of the Maguindanao Massacre–pointed out the importance of remembering the grisly incident on November 23, four years ago, as a stark example of how impunity threatens the very fabric of democratic ideals.

“I have always been shocked that this is the biggest massacre of journalists–the biggest collective death of journalists in the world–in the history of journalism,” he said.

“I think it is very important to remember this incident to make this a message of eradication of impunity,” La Rue added.

Below is the full transcription of La Rue’s special message:

My name is Frank La Rue and I’m the UN special rapporteur for the freedom of expression around the world. (And) I want to take this opportunity to send a very special message to the people of the Philippines.

First of all, because of the typhoon that affected the Philippines my solidarity and my prayers are with the people of the Philippines at this moment to overcome this huge tragedy, who moved us all in the world.

And secondly, because this is the anniversary of the Maguindanao massacre, I was in Manila for the first anniversary and as special rapporteur on freedom of expression, I have always been shocked that this is the biggest massacre of journalists–the biggest collective death of journalists in the world–in the history of journalism.

(And) I think it is very important to remember this incident to make this a message of eradication of impunity. Every time that an act of violence against a journalist remains without investigation, without justice, is the invitation–not for one other act but–for many more to occur.

For me, analyzing violence against journalism, the biggest cause of violence in the world against journalists is impunity. We have to eradicate impunity and I hope Philippines becomes an example of this.

The best for you all.