Crime, corruption, tax evasion: $991B illicit capital flows in 2012

By Global Financial Integrity

A RECORD US$991.2 billion in illicit capital flowed out of developing and emerging economies in 2012, facilitated by crime, corruption, and tax evasion, according to the latest study released Tuesday by Global Financial Integrity (GFI), a Washington DC-based research and advisory organization. The study is the first GFI analysis to include estimates of illicit financial flows for 2012.

The report, GFI’s 2014 annual global update on illicit financial flows, pegs cumulative illicit outflows from developing economies at US$6.6 trillion between 2003 and 2012, the latest year for which data are available.

Titled “Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2003-2012,” the report finds that illicit outflows are growing at an inflation-adjusted 9.4 percent per year—roughly double global GDP growth over the same period.

The report demonstrates that, “illicit financial flows are the most damaging economic problem plaguing the world’s developing and emerging economies,” said GFI President Raymond Baker, a longtime authority on financial crime.

The PH Story

Every year, no thanks to crime, corruption, tax evasion, and trade misinvoicing, the Philippines loses an average of US$9.35 billion — or about Php415.14 billion — to illicit capital flight.

According to the report, across a nine-year period from 2003 to 2012, these malefactors have cost the Philippines an indicative total of US$93.49 billion, or about PhP4.15 trillion, nearly double the general appropriations act for 2015.

By year, the report recorded illicit capital outflows from the country thus:

* US$8.3 billion in 2003;
* US$9.2 billion in 2004;
* US$13.5 billion in 2005;
* US$10.0 billion in 2006;
* US$7.99 billion in 2007;
* US$6.9 billion in 2008;
* US$8.66 billion in 2009;
* US$8.9 billion in 2010;
* US$11 billion in 2011; and
* US$9.16 billion in 2012

“These outflows—already greater than the combined sum of all FDI (foreign direct investments) and ODA (official development aid) flowing into these countries—are sapping roughly a trillion dollars per year from the world’s poor and middle-income economies,” Baker said.

“Most troubling, however, is the fact that these outflows are growing at an alarming rate of 9.4 percent per year—twice as fast as global GDP,” said Baker. “It is simply impossible to achieve sustainable global development unless world leaders agree to address this issue head-on. That’s why it is essential for the United Nations to include a specific target next year to halve all trade-related illicit flows by 2030 as part of post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda.”

Authored by GFI Chief Economist Dev Kar and GFI Junior Economist Joseph Spanjers, the study reveals that illicit financial flows hit an historic high of US$991.2 billion in 2012, marking a dramatic increase from 2003, when illicit outflows totaled a mere US$297.4 billion.

Over the span of the decade, the report finds that illicit financial flows are growing at an inflation-adjusted average rate of 9.4 percent per year. Still, in many parts of the world, the authors note that illicit flows are growing much faster—particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and in Sub-Saharan Africa, where illicit flows are growing at an average annual inflation-adjusted rate of 24.2 and 13.2 percent, respectively.

Totaling US$6.6 trillion over the entire decade, illicit financial flows averaged a staggering 3.9 percent of the developing world’s GDP.

As a share of its economy, Sub-Saharan Africa suffered the largest illicit financial outflows—averaging 5.5 percent of its GDP—followed by developing Europe (4.4 percent), Asia (3.7 percent), MENA (3.7 percent), and the Western Hemisphere (3.3 percent).

“It’s extremely troubling to note just how fast illicit flows are growing,” stated Dr. Kar, the principal author of the study. “Over the past decade, illicit outflows from developing countries increased by 9.4 percent each year in real terms, significantly outpacing economic growth. Moreover, these outflows are growing fastest in and taking the largest toll—as a share of GDP—on some of the poorest regions of the world. These findings underscore the urgency with which policymakers should address illicit financial flows.”

According to the report, ‘fraudulent misinvoicing of trade transactions was revealed to be the largest component of illicit financial flows from developing countries, accounting for 77.8 percent of all illicit flows—highlighting that any effort to significantly curtail illicit financial flows must address trade misinvoicing.

The US$991.2 billion that flowed illicitly out of developing countries in 2012, the report said, was greater than the combined total of foreign direct investment (FDI) and net official development assistance (ODA), which these economies received that year.

Illicit outflows were roughly 1.3 times the US$789.4 billion in total FDI, and they were 11.1 times the US$89.7 billion in ODA that these economies received in 2012.

“Illicit financial flows have major consequences for developing economies,” explained Spanjers, the report’s co-author. “Emerging and developing countries hemorrhaged a trillion dollars from their economies in 2012 that could have been invested in local businesses, healthcare, education, or infrastructure. This is a trillion dollars that could have contributed to inclusive economic growth, legitimate private-sector job creation, and sound public budgets. Without concrete action addressing illicit outflows, the drain on the developing world is only going to grow larger.”

Country Rankings
The study by Kar and Spanjers tracks the amount of illegal capital flowing out of 151 different developing and emerging countries over the 10-year period from 2003 through 2012, and it ranks the countries by the volume of illicit outflows.

According to the report, the 25 biggest exporters of illicit financial flows over the decade are:

1. China, US$125.24bn average (US$1.25tr cumulative)
2. Russia, US$97.39bn avg. (US$973.86bn cum.)
3. Mexico, US$51.43bn avg. (US$514.26bn cum.)
4. India, US$43.96bn avg. (US$439.59bn cum.)
5. Malaysia, US$39.49bn avg. (US$394.87bn cum.)
6. Saudi Arabia……. US$30.86bn avg. (US$308.62bn cum.)1
7. Brazil, US$21.71bn avg. (US$217.10bn cum.)
8. Indonesia, US$18.78bn avg. (US$187.84bn cum.)
9. Thailand, US$17.17bn avg. (US$171.68bn cum.)
10. Nigeria, US$15.75bn avg. (US$157.46bn cum.)
11. A.E, US$13.53bn avg. (US$135.30bn cum.) 1
12. South Africa, US$12.21bn avg. (US$122.14bn cum.)
13. Iraq, US$11.14bn avg. (US$89.10bn cum.) 2
14. Costa Rica, US$9.40bn avg. (US$94.03bn cum.)
15. Philippines, US$9.35bn avg. (US$93.49bn cum.)
16. Belarus, US$8.45bn avg. (US$84.53bn cum.)
17. Poland, US$5.31bn avg. (US$53.12bn cum.)
18. Panama, US$4.85bn avg. (US$48.48bn cum.)
19. Serbia, US$4.57bn avg. (US$45.66bn cum.)
20. Chile, US$4.56bn avg. (US$45.64bn cum.)
21. Brunei, US$4.30bn avg. (US$34.40bn cum.) 3
22. Syria, US$3.77bn avg. (US$37.68bn cum.)
23. Egypt, US$3.77bn avg. (US$37.68bn cum.)
24. Paraguay, US$3.70bn avg. (US$36.97bn cum.)
25. Venezuela, US$3.68bn avg. (US$36.77bn cum.)

GFI also found that the top exporters of illegal capital in 2012 were:
1. China, US$249.57bn
2. Russia, US$122.86bn
3. India, US$94.76bn
4. Mexico, US$59.66bn
5. Malaysia, US$48.93bn
6. Saudi Arabia, US$46.53bn
7. Thailand, US$35.56bn
8. Brazil, US$33.93bn
9. South Africa, US$29.13bn
10. Costa Rica, US$21.55bn
11. Indonesia, US$20.82bn
12. A.E, US$19.40bn
13. Iraq, US$14.65bn
14. Belarus, US$13.90bn
15. Philippines, US$9.16bn
16. Syria, US$8.64bn
17. Nigeria, US$7.92bn
18. Trinidad & Tobago, US$7.41bn
19. Vietnam, US$6.93bn
20. Lithuania, US$6.45bn
21. Libya, US$5.40bn
22. Panama, US$5.34bn
23. Aruba, US$5.29bn
24. Egypt, US$5.09bn
25. Chile, US$5.08bn

The report recommends that world leaders focus on curbing the opacity in the global financial system, which facilitates these outflows. Specifically, GFI maintains that:

* Governments should establish public registries of meaningful beneficial ownership information on all legal entities;
* Financial regulators should require that all banks in their country know the true beneficial owner(s) of any account opened in their financial institution;
* Government authorities should adopt and fully implement all of the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) anti-money laundering recommendations;
* Regulators and law enforcement authorities should ensure that all of the anti-money laundering regulations, which are already on the books, are strongly enforced;
* Policymakers should require multinational companies to publicly disclose their revenues, profits, losses, sales, taxes paid, subsidiaries, and staff levels on a country-by-country basis;
* All countries should actively participate in the worldwide movement towards the automatic exchange of tax information as endorsed by the OECD and the G20;
* Trade transactions involving tax haven jurisdictions should be treated with the highest level of scrutiny by customs, tax, and law enforcement officials;
* Governments should significantly boost their customs enforcement, by equipping and training officers to better detect intentional misinvoicing of trade transactions; and
* The United Nations should adopt a clear and concise Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) to halve trade-related illicit financial flows by 2030 and similar language should be included in the outcome document of the Financing for Development Conference in July 2015.

Not so clean yet… but improving

Country’s ranking improves in latest transparency survey

JUST FIVE days shy of the United Nations-declared International Anti-Corruption Day, the Philippines showed a slightly better score in the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) of an international anti-corruption watchdog.

Transparency International-Philippines ranked the country 85th against 175 other countries and territories in its 2014 survey titled: “Clean growth at risk.” The country’s rank is an improvement over its ranking last year.

The 20th edition of the CPI showed that the Philippines has advanced its ranking from 94th out of 177 in 2013 and 105th out of 175 in 2012. This year, the country scored 38/100—with zero as perceived to be highly corrupt and 100 as perceived to be very clean. Last year, the country’s score was 36 while in 2012 it was 34.

Economic growth is weakened when “leaders and high level officials abuse power to appropriate public funds for personal gain.” – José Ugaz, Transparency International chairman

“We consider a score of +4 to represent change in the perceived level of corruption,” Dr. Cleo Calimbahin, Transparency International-Philippines executive director, said.

“Although the Philippines still belongs to two thirds of the 175 countries ranked who scored below 50, this is a marked improvement from the 2012 CPI score,” Calimbahin added.

GRAPHICS by Transparency International

GRAPHICS by Transparency International

The CPI is a survey of the perception of corruption in the public sector by business people and country experts outside of the Philippines. It is an annual report of Transparency International as a snapshot of the relative degree of corruption by ranking countries from all over the world.

José Ugaz, chair of Transparency International said the latest CPI shows how economic growth is weakened when “leaders and high level officials abuse power to appropriate public funds for personal gain.”

“Corrupt officials smuggle ill-gotten assets into safe havens through offshore companies with absolute impunity,” Ugaz added.

It can be recalled that on April 4, last year, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ)—in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalism (ICIJ)—published a two-part cross-border investigative report on Filipino politicians who maintained offshore trusts in the British Virgin Isles.

Politicians who have been outed in the report included Ilocos governor Maria Imelda “Imee” Marcos-Manotoc, Senator Joseph Victor G. Ejercito, and then Senator Manny B. Villar.

The ICIJ obtained data on 122,000 offshore companies or trusts, about 12,000 intermediaries (agents or “introducers”), and some 130,000 records of the people and agents who run, own, benefit from or hide behind offshore companies. But instead of just uploading the raw documents online, ICIJ partnered with journalists and media agencies to check out and verify the data.

The project has been touted as one of the biggest cross-border investigative partnerships in journalism history and one of the biggest financial leaks in history.

Transparency International said the latest CPI also shows that “corporate secrecy, global money laundering, the abuse of power, secret dealings and bribery continue to ravage societies around the world.”

GRAPHICS by Cong B. Corrales

GRAPHICS by Cong B. Corrales

“Countries at the bottom need to adopt radical anti-corruption measures in favour of their people. Countries at the top of the index should make sure they don’t export corrupt practices to underdeveloped countries,” Ugaz said.

This year’s International Anti-Corruption Day theme—Break the corruption chain—concurs with the call of Transparency International.

“Corruption attacks the foundation of democratic institutions by distorting electoral processes, perverting the rule of law and creating bureaucratic quagmire whose only reason for existing is the soliciting of bribes,” the United Nation said in its website.

On December 2005, the UN General Assembly declared every December 9 of the year as the International Anti-Corruption Day to raise awareness of corruption and of the role of the Convention against Corruption in combating and preventing it. Cong B. Corrales

‘Uncovering Asia’ will gather top investigative journalists in Manila

Mark your calendars!

Uncovering Asia: The 1st Asian Investigative Journalism Conference, a breakthrough event, will be held in Manila on Nov. 22-24, 2014.

The conference will bring together top investigative reporters, data journalists, and media law and security experts from across Asia and around the world.

It will mark as well two other important occasions: a special reception honoring the 25th anniversary of the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism, one of the world’s pioneering nonprofit media centers; and the UN-designated International Day to End Impunity on November 23.

Award-winning journalists and experts on data analysis and visualization, business investigations, corruption, crime, and cross-border collaboration will conduct workshops, including:

* Advanced online search techniques by Internet sleuth Paul Myers of the BBC.

* Tracking business across borders with Investigative Dashboard by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project.

* Uncovering hidden assets with the Offshore Leaks Database of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

Among the speakers are:

* Mar Cabra, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

* Ying Chan, University of Hong Kong Media Studies Centre

* Umar Cheema, The News/Center for Investigative Reporting Pakistan

* Reg Chua, Thomson Reuters

* Sheila Coronel, Columbia University School of Journalism

* Kunda Dixit, Nepal Center for Investigative Journalism

* Govindraj Ethiraj, IndiaSpend

* David Kaplan, Global Investigative Journalism Network

* Malou Mangahas, Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism

* Nils Mulvad, Investigative Reporting Denmark

* Paul Myers, BBC

* Syed Nazakat, The Week, India

* Peter Noorlander, Media Legal Defence Initiative

* Paul Radu, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project

* Giannina Segnini, Columbia University

* Drew Sullivan, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project

* Yoichiro Tateiwa, NHK, Japan

Uncovering Asia is hosted by the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN), the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, with additional support from the Open Society Foundations.

GIJN is composed of nonprofit investigative journalism organizations that produce stories, conduct training, provide resources, and encourage the creation of similar nonprofit groups.

PCIJ is a founding member of GIJN.

GIJN was created in 2003 when more than 300 journalists from around the world gathered for the second Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. Since then it has grown to more than 100 member organizations in 45 countries.

Unlocking China’s Secrets: Get all the data you want!

Readers can now find information about more than 37,000 tax havens clients from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database

By Mar Cabra and Marina Walker Guevara
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

ICIJ’s latest “China Leaks” stories this week revealed the offshore holdings of dozens of powerful Chinese financial and political players. Today we’re going a step further — unveiling more than 37,000 names of offshore clients from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan connected to companies and trusts in 10 tax havens.

Ordinarily, this information is secret or extremely hard to access — even for law-enforcement officials.

But now citizens, scholars, investigators and others will be able to quickly search for names and connections among people and offshore entities linked to the Greater China region. You can learn how to best explore these connections by watching this video tutorial. Or you can go straight to the Offshore Leaks Database and start doing name and keyword searches.

RESOURCES AND MAPS: Check it out!

ICIJ Interactive Map: Offshore Stories

How to Navigate the Map

ICIJ’S Offshore Leaks Database

ICIJ Offshore Leaks Video Tutorial

ICIJ Offshore Leaks Network of Journalists

The database launched in June, but the details from Greater China were withheld while reporting was ongoing. Now available in English and Chinese, this interactive application is likely the biggest release of data to date showing how Chinese use the offshore world.

While the database opens up a world that has never been revealed on such a massive scale, the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database is not a “data dump” — it is a careful release of basic corporate information. ICIJ won’t release personal data en masse; the Offshore Leaks Database doesn’t include records of bank accounts and financial transactions, emails and other correspondence, passports and telephone numbers. The selected and limited information is being published in the public interest.

The names and connections are part of a cache of 2.5 million leaked files ICIJ analyzed with more than 110 journalists over the last two years. Media partners include more than 50 leading organizations, including The Guardian (U.K. and U.S.), Le Monde (France), Süddeutsche Zeitung (Germany), El País (Spain) and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Built by a multinational team of reporters and programmers in Costa Rica, the U.K., Spain and the U.S., the database has already received close to 6 million page views from 224 countries. It allows readers to not only learn about the ownership of thousands of secret companies, but also to explore the networks around their directors, proxy shareholders and real owners.

ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks Database reveals the names behind more than 100,000 secret companies and trusts created by two offshore services firms: Singapore-based Portcullis TrustNet and BVI-based Commonwealth Trust Limited (CTL). Their clients are spread over more than 170 countries and territories.

The latest revelations, published on Jan. 21, exposed how close relatives of China’s top Communist leaders and wealthiest capitalists have held secretive offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and other offshore centers. A few hours after the articles were published, Chinese censors blocked access to them on ICIJ’s website and the websites of other partner publications.

Still more stories may be found among the more than 37,000 names being released today. Part of the goal of making this information public is to crowd-source. Please get in touch with us if you find something worth investigating. You may also download the data to your computer and explore the information more deeply.

Pressure for Change

ICIJ’s reporting to date has revealed the offshore dealings of politicians, oligarchs, rogue nations and even religious leaders. While many of the arrangements are perfectly legal, extensive reporting by ICIJ and others show that the anonymity granted by the offshore economy facilitates money laundering, tax evasion, fraud and other crimes.

Even when it’s legal, transparency advocates argue that the use of an alternative, parallel economy undermines democracy because it benefits a few at the expense of the majority.

EU Commissioner Algirdas Semeta said the ICIJ’s investigation has transformed tax politics and amplified political will to tackle the problem of tax evasion – knocking down what the EU Observer called “a wall of apathy” in Europe that had thwarted previous attempts to attack offshore secrecy.

“I personally think Offshore Leaks could be identified as the most significant trigger behind these developments… It has created visibility of the issue and it has triggered political recognition of the amplitude of the problem,” he told EU Observer.

Semeta said the need for tax transparency overrides the principle of data privacy.

During a visit to the White House in May 2013, British Prime Minister David Cameron made a strong pitch for tackling what he called “the scourge of tax evasion,” one of the central themes of that year’s “G8″ meeting, in Northern Ireland, of leaders of eight of the world’s wealthiest countries. “We need to know who really owns a company, who profits from it, whether taxes are paid,” said Cameron.

“Secrecy is no longer acceptable. We need to get rid of it,” Pascal Saint-Amans, tax policy director for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, told The Toronto Star. “If the rules make it possible, then we’ll change the rules.”

“Secrecy creates an environment where fraud, tax evasion, money laundering and other forms of corruption thrive. The Offshore Leaks Database helps remove this secrecy,” said ICIJ director Gerard Ryle. “Opening up the records serves the public interest by bringing accountability to an industry that has long operated in the shadows.”

Unlocking China’s Secrets: Get all the data you want!

Readers can now find information about more than 37,000 tax havens clients from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database

By Mar Cabra and Marina Walker Guevara
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

ICIJ’s latest “China Leaks” stories this week revealed the offshore holdings of dozens of powerful Chinese financial and political players. Today we’re going a step further — unveiling more than 37,000 names of offshore clients from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan connected to companies and trusts in 10 tax havens.

Ordinarily, this information is secret or extremely hard to access — even for law-enforcement officials.

But now citizens, scholars, investigators and others will be able to quickly search for names and connections among people and offshore entities linked to the Greater China region. You can learn how to best explore these connections by watching this video tutorial. Or you can go straight to the Offshore Leaks Database and start doing name and keyword searches.

RESOURCES AND MAPS: Check it out!

ICIJ Interactive Map: Offshore Stories

How to Navigate the Map

ICIJ’S Offshore Leaks Database

ICIJ Offshore Leaks Video Tutorial

ICIJ Offshore Leaks Network of Journalists

The database launched in June, but the details from Greater China were withheld while reporting was ongoing. Now available in English and Chinese, this interactive application is likely the biggest release of data to date showing how Chinese use the offshore world.

While the database opens up a world that has never been revealed on such a massive scale, the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database is not a “data dump” — it is a careful release of basic corporate information. ICIJ won’t release personal data en masse; the Offshore Leaks Database doesn’t include records of bank accounts and financial transactions, emails and other correspondence, passports and telephone numbers. The selected and limited information is being published in the public interest.

The names and connections are part of a cache of 2.5 million leaked files ICIJ analyzed with more than 110 journalists over the last two years. Media partners include more than 50 leading organizations, including The Guardian (U.K. and U.S.), Le Monde (France), Süddeutsche Zeitung (Germany), El País (Spain) and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Built by a multinational team of reporters and programmers in Costa Rica, the U.K., Spain and the U.S., the database has already received close to 6 million page views from 224 countries. It allows readers to not only learn about the ownership of thousands of secret companies, but also to explore the networks around their directors, proxy shareholders and real owners.

ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks Database reveals the names behind more than 100,000 secret companies and trusts created by two offshore services firms: Singapore-based Portcullis TrustNet and BVI-based Commonwealth Trust Limited (CTL). Their clients are spread over more than 170 countries and territories.

The latest revelations, published on Jan. 21, exposed how close relatives of China’s top Communist leaders and wealthiest capitalists have held secretive offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and other offshore centers. A few hours after the articles were published, Chinese censors blocked access to them on ICIJ’s website and the websites of other partner publications.

Still more stories may be found among the more than 37,000 names being released today. Part of the goal of making this information public is to crowd-source. Please get in touch with us if you find something worth investigating. You may also download the data to your computer and explore the information more deeply.

Pressure for Change

ICIJ’s reporting to date has revealed the offshore dealings of politicians, oligarchs, rogue nations and even religious leaders. While many of the arrangements are perfectly legal, extensive reporting by ICIJ and others show that the anonymity granted by the offshore economy facilitates money laundering, tax evasion, fraud and other crimes.

Even when it’s legal, transparency advocates argue that the use of an alternative, parallel economy undermines democracy because it benefits a few at the expense of the majority.

EU Commissioner Algirdas Semeta said the ICIJ’s investigation has transformed tax politics and amplified political will to tackle the problem of tax evasion – knocking down what the EU Observer called “a wall of apathy” in Europe that had thwarted previous attempts to attack offshore secrecy.

“I personally think Offshore Leaks could be identified as the most significant trigger behind these developments… It has created visibility of the issue and it has triggered political recognition of the amplitude of the problem,” he told EU Observer.

Semeta said the need for tax transparency overrides the principle of data privacy.

During a visit to the White House in May 2013, British Prime Minister David Cameron made a strong pitch for tackling what he called “the scourge of tax evasion,” one of the central themes of that year’s “G8″ meeting, in Northern Ireland, of leaders of eight of the world’s wealthiest countries. “We need to know who really owns a company, who profits from it, whether taxes are paid,” said Cameron.

“Secrecy is no longer acceptable. We need to get rid of it,” Pascal Saint-Amans, tax policy director for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, told The Toronto Star. “If the rules make it possible, then we’ll change the rules.”

“Secrecy creates an environment where fraud, tax evasion, money laundering and other forms of corruption thrive. The Offshore Leaks Database helps remove this secrecy,” said ICIJ director Gerard Ryle. “Opening up the records serves the public interest by bringing accountability to an industry that has long operated in the shadows.”