Well- meaning warning to the President from an ally


(Quote on immunity from suits starts at 17:40 mins)

In many of his speeches , President Rodrigo Duterte flaunts his immunity from suits as an armor amid mounting concerns about the extra-judicial killings in his campaign against illegal drugs.

In a speech before troops at Camp Gen. Macario B. Peralta, JR, Jamindan, Capiz last Aug. 5, he said, “Ang Presidente, hindi mo ma-demanda. ..mag-order ako ng patay, you cannot arrest me, may immunity ako.”

It’s not only those dealing with illegal drugs that he wants killed but all those he believes pose obstructions to his desire to improve the lives of the Filipino people.

While visiting the V. Luna AFP Medical Center, last Aug. 2, he expressed frustration over the refusal of some business owners to stop “Endo” – the distortion of contractualization where workers’ employment is terminated at the fifth month before the end of the six-month probationary period to avoid making the workers permanent employees entitled to labor benefits.

Pres. Duterte talking to the troops at Camp M. Peralta in Jamindan, Capiz.

Pres. Duterte talking to the troops at Camp M. Peralta in Jamindan, Capiz.

Duterte said: “Ako mag-warning lang: Stop contractualization or patayin kita. You know why kaya ako magsalita ng ganun ang Presidente? While I am here, may immunity ako.”

During the Mindanao summit early this month, he said he is looking for a “killer” to head the the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office, which he said is corruption-riddled. “I’d like to give you a warning: Do not F.. with me. I cannot pronounce the exact word, just the F and C. Don’t dare me. As President, I have the immunity from civil or criminal. If I lose my patience, I’ll call and shoot you,” he said.

Duterte’s immunity from suits is only during his incumbency as president. After June 30, 2022, he becomes fair game to those who want to haul him into court.

Duterte said he is not worried and directed people to the Revised Penal Code: “Ang sabi ng Revised Penal Code, pagdating ng 70, i-release ka na. All persons upon reaching the age.. mandatory ilabas. 71 na ako. Pagkatapos ko Presidente, 77. Saan mo ko ilagay? O ‘di wala naman,” he said to the amusement of the soldiers listening.

Lawyer Raymond Fortun corrected the President.

Atty. Raymond Fortun

Atty. Raymond Fortun

In a Facebook post, Fortun said, “With all due respect to the President, he is wrong here.”

Fortun explained that, “ Age is merely a mitigating circumstance. (Art. 13, Sec. 2, RPC). It does not mean that he cannot be charged and, if found convicted, cannot serve his sentence in a jail.

“Being 70 years of age merely reduces the penalty to its minimum (or, if there are other mitigating circumstances, by 1 to 2 degrees lower),” the lawyer further said.

Fortun gave as an example former senator Juan Ponce Enrile who was charged and imprisoned for plunder at the age of 90. He was later allowed to post bail for humanitarian reason.

Philippine incumbent presidents are protected by the Constitution in order for them to perform their job unhampered by legal obstacles but they are not totally touchable if they commit a crime against humanity.

Last Aug. 2, Kabayan Rep. Harry Roque, a human rights lawyer before he entered politics, delivered a privileged speech saying that although Duterte is immune from suits during his six-year term as president he may be indicted for the continuing spate of extrajudicial killings related to the government’s campaign against illegal drugs by the International Criminal Court.

The rising number of those killed in the campaign against illegal (1,054 as of Aug. 16, 2016 since May 10, when Duterte was elected president according to ABS-CBN monitoring ) has raised concerns not only among concerned citizens in the country but also international groups and media.

Roque belongs to the super-majority in the House of Representatives led by Duterte ally Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez. He said, “while it would be imprudent for me to say with certainty that President Duterte has already committed a crime against humanity, it would be a disservice to this entire nation if I did not warn [the president] to be careful.”

Roque said Article 7, Section 1 of the Rome Statute– the treaty that established the ICC of which the Philippines is party to – a “crime against humanity” is a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population with knowledge of such attack.

Rep. Harry Roque delivering his speech on International Humanitarian Law Day.

Rep. Harry Roque delivering his speech on International Humanitarian Law Day.

“By definition, crimes against humanity may be committed even in times of peace, without the existence of an armed conflict,” he said.

Roque warned that the principle of state immunity granted to a sitting president “is not an effective shield against the ICC.”

Roque said, “The ICC has indicted leaders even during their term of power. It has done so in Kenya, Sudan, and others. Even without actual or direct participation, the President can be indicted for crimes under the principle of Command Responsibility so long as he knew that such crime was being committed, and he failed to take all necessary and reasonable measures within his power to stop such acts. The ICC does not need to wait for news about the massacre of an entire town or barangay before it investigates.

“If the administration does not temper the methods it has been using over the past few weeks, then it is only a matter of time before the international community turns its focus to the Philippines for justice,” he said.

That’s coming from an ally.

Do we take President Duterte seriously?

Duterte threatens to declare martial law before troops in Camp Evangelista, Cagayan de Oro.

Duterte threatens to declare martial law before troops in Camp Evangelista, Cagayan de Oro.


I take him seriously because the president of the Republic of the Philippines is so powerful that with a stroke of a pen, he can save a life or send the nation to war.

Last Tuesday, President Duterte threatened to declare martial law.

“ Please, ‘wag mo akong… hindi ako gago. If this continues, pigilan mo ako eh ‘di sige. ‘Pag nagwala na...or would you rather that I will declare martial law?, he said before the Philippine Army’s 4th Infantry Division in Camp Evangelista in Cagayan de Oro.

Duterte was lashing out on Chief Justice Lourdes Sereno who stood up to him by reminding him of the separation of powers and other provisions in the Constitution which he could have violated when he read a list of alleged illegal drugs protector including seven judges. Others in more than 150 names in the list were congressmen, military officials, police officers, mayors, and vice mayors.

He said the list ““has undergone a process” which many thought meant the involvement of those named had been validated.
Within 24 hours, errors in the list were pointed out.

Sereno said one of the judges named had long been dead and the other was dismissed from the judiciary nine years ago. Three others are presiding in courts not handling drug cases.

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

This was the statement of Sereno that made Duterte ballistic: “To safeguard the role of the judges as the protector of constitutional rights, I would caution them very strongly against ‘surrendering’ or making themselves physically accountable to any police officer in the absence of any duly-issued warrant of arrest that is pending.”

Duterte, a former prosecutor bristled at Sereno’s advice to observe due process: “Manghingi ka ng warrant? Madam Chief Justice, you must be joking. You must be joking. Dalawa tayo abogado. Kayong lahat sa Supreme Court…do you know how long it would take to secure a warrant of arrest?

“One single case in the Republic of the Philippines, the warrant to issue is a minimum of two months, three months. Pagdating sa Korte, Madam Justice, it will take forever. ‘Pag natalo, aakayat yan sa Court of Appeals. It would sit there for about two years.”
The President issued a counter warning to the Chief Justice:

“So, ikaw ang winarningan ko, hindi ako.”Do not create a crisis because I will order everybody in the executive department not to honor you.”

The threat of declaring martial law sent alarm bells ringing especially to human rights advocates and those who had experienced martial law under the late Ferdinand Marcos.

Immediately, Malacanang went into damage control. Press Secretary Martin Andanar said in a statement said, “The President merely asked a rhetorical question and said it under the context that his anti-drug campaign cannot wait for the slow wheels of justice – [Philippines] style. We have an Action Man for a President who believes justice delayed is justice denied. He is the type, who at the onset of his presidency, simply wants to hit the ground running and rid society of drugs, crime, and corruption with urgency.”

It did not help, however, that Presidential legal counsel Salvador Panelo underscored that “The Constitution says the President can declare martial law not only in cases of invasion or rebellion, but when public safety requires it. Right now, the safety of the public is in imminent danger.”

He then backtracked with,“I don’t think the President will do that.”

Senate Minority Leader Ralph G. Recto advised the public to “learn to auto-delete the colorful parts of Digong’s statements.
For those who are outraged, Recto said, “the best coping mechanism is not to let his curses get in the way of studying the causes he is fighting for.”

Recto is being kind. Many can only turn to prayers like artist-activist Mae Paner who articulated the distress of many in her Facebook post:

Artist-activist Mae Paner

Artist-activist Mae Paner

“Napapa-isip Ako

“Lord, anong klaseng anghel ang ibinigay mo sa amin? Parang halimaw ang iniregalomo sa amin. Mali ba ako?

“Yung pagmumura kayang sikmurain. Pero yung pumapatay para sa katahimikan namin? Thank you? Yung maglilibing kay Marcos sa Libingan ng mga Bayani? Whew! Yung magde-declare ng unilateral ceasefire tapos babawiin? Game show? Yung sasabihing baliw ang sarili niyang anak on national tv? Wow! Yung bumabastos sa bangkay at kababaihan? Arayko! Yung nagbabanta sa Supreme Court justice? Pak! Yung nagbabanta ulit ng martial law? Wagas! Yung ang extra judicial killings ginawang bisyo? Nakakaloka!

“Bangungot ba ito? Pagsubok? O nang-iinis ka Lord? Pikon talo?

“Actually…

“Gusto kong manahimik dahil may takot pa din ako. Gusto kong umayon dahil baka ma-bully ako ng mga bilib sa kanya. Gusto ko siyang bigyan ng pagkakataon dahil bagong upo lang siya. Gusto kong pumalakpak dahil itataas daw niya sahod ng kapatid kong sundalo. Gusto kong magduda pero binigyan niya ng puwesto ang ilang progresibo. Gusto kong isiping di hamak naman siyang mas magaling kesa kay Aquino.

“Sa wakas may FOI at tuloy na ang RH. May pag-asa ang divorce.

“Gusto ko pang ngumiti pero bakit ang sakit ng panga ko? Gusto ko pang umasa na tunay ang ginagawa niyang pagbabago. O sadyang tanga lang ba ako?

“Masasanay rin ako sa style niya? Hanggang mamanhid?

“Sino ba ang nilalaro nino Lord? Sirit na.

“Isa’t kalahating buwan pa lang ang nabawas sa anim na taon. Lamang kalsada pa rin ba ako hanggang mag edad 59?

“Lord, bakit ang sakit mong magmahal!?!

Do we take President Duterte seriously?

Duterte threatens to declare martial law before troops in Camp Evangelista, Cagayan de Oro.

Duterte threatens to declare martial law before troops in Camp Evangelista, Cagayan de Oro.


I take him seriously because the president of the Republic of the Philippines is so powerful that with a stroke of a pen, he can save a life or send the nation to war.

Last Tuesday, President Duterte threatened to declare martial law.

“ Please, ‘wag mo akong… hindi ako gago. If this continues, pigilan mo ako eh ‘di sige. ‘Pag nagwala na...or would you rather that I will declare martial law?, he said before the Philippine Army’s 4th Infantry Division in Camp Evangelista in Cagayan de Oro.

Duterte was lashing out on Chief Justice Lourdes Sereno who stood up to him by reminding him of the separation of powers and other provisions in the Constitution which he could have violated when he read a list of alleged illegal drugs protector including seven judges. Others in more than 150 names in the list were congressmen, military officials, police officers, mayors, and vice mayors.

He said the list ““has undergone a process” which many thought meant the involvement of those named had been validated.
Within 24 hours, errors in the list were pointed out.

Sereno said one of the judges named had long been dead and the other was dismissed from the judiciary nine years ago. Three others are presiding in courts not handling drug cases.

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno

This was the statement of Sereno that made Duterte ballistic: “To safeguard the role of the judges as the protector of constitutional rights, I would caution them very strongly against ‘surrendering’ or making themselves physically accountable to any police officer in the absence of any duly-issued warrant of arrest that is pending.”

Duterte, a former prosecutor bristled at Sereno’s advice to observe due process: “Manghingi ka ng warrant? Madam Chief Justice, you must be joking. You must be joking. Dalawa tayo abogado. Kayong lahat sa Supreme Court…do you know how long it would take to secure a warrant of arrest?

“One single case in the Republic of the Philippines, the warrant to issue is a minimum of two months, three months. Pagdating sa Korte, Madam Justice, it will take forever. ‘Pag natalo, aakayat yan sa Court of Appeals. It would sit there for about two years.”
The President issued a counter warning to the Chief Justice:

“So, ikaw ang winarningan ko, hindi ako.”Do not create a crisis because I will order everybody in the executive department not to honor you.”

The threat of declaring martial law sent alarm bells ringing especially to human rights advocates and those who had experienced martial law under the late Ferdinand Marcos.

Immediately, Malacanang went into damage control. Press Secretary Martin Andanar said in a statement said, “The President merely asked a rhetorical question and said it under the context that his anti-drug campaign cannot wait for the slow wheels of justice – [Philippines] style. We have an Action Man for a President who believes justice delayed is justice denied. He is the type, who at the onset of his presidency, simply wants to hit the ground running and rid society of drugs, crime, and corruption with urgency.”

It did not help, however, that Presidential legal counsel Salvador Panelo underscored that “The Constitution says the President can declare martial law not only in cases of invasion or rebellion, but when public safety requires it. Right now, the safety of the public is in imminent danger.”

He then backtracked with,“I don’t think the President will do that.”

Senate Minority Leader Ralph G. Recto advised the public to “learn to auto-delete the colorful parts of Digong’s statements.
For those who are outraged, Recto said, “the best coping mechanism is not to let his curses get in the way of studying the causes he is fighting for.”

Recto is being kind. Many can only turn to prayers like artist-activist Mae Paner who articulated the distress of many in her Facebook post:

Artist-activist Mae Paner

Artist-activist Mae Paner

“Napapa-isip Ako

“Lord, anong klaseng anghel ang ibinigay mo sa amin? Parang halimaw ang iniregalomo sa amin. Mali ba ako?

“Yung pagmumura kayang sikmurain. Pero yung pumapatay para sa katahimikan namin? Thank you? Yung maglilibing kay Marcos sa Libingan ng mga Bayani? Whew! Yung magde-declare ng unilateral ceasefire tapos babawiin? Game show? Yung sasabihing baliw ang sarili niyang anak on national tv? Wow! Yung bumabastos sa bangkay at kababaihan? Arayko! Yung nagbabanta sa Supreme Court justice? Pak! Yung nagbabanta ulit ng martial law? Wagas! Yung ang extra judicial killings ginawang bisyo? Nakakaloka!

“Bangungot ba ito? Pagsubok? O nang-iinis ka Lord? Pikon talo?

“Actually…

“Gusto kong manahimik dahil may takot pa din ako. Gusto kong umayon dahil baka ma-bully ako ng mga bilib sa kanya. Gusto ko siyang bigyan ng pagkakataon dahil bagong upo lang siya. Gusto kong pumalakpak dahil itataas daw niya sahod ng kapatid kong sundalo. Gusto kong magduda pero binigyan niya ng puwesto ang ilang progresibo. Gusto kong isiping di hamak naman siyang mas magaling kesa kay Aquino.

“Sa wakas may FOI at tuloy na ang RH. May pag-asa ang divorce.

“Gusto ko pang ngumiti pero bakit ang sakit ng panga ko? Gusto ko pang umasa na tunay ang ginagawa niyang pagbabago. O sadyang tanga lang ba ako?

“Masasanay rin ako sa style niya? Hanggang mamanhid?

“Sino ba ang nilalaro nino Lord? Sirit na.

“Isa’t kalahating buwan pa lang ang nabawas sa anim na taon. Lamang kalsada pa rin ba ako hanggang mag edad 59?

“Lord, bakit ang sakit mong magmahal!?!

Photo-journalists debunk doubts on ‘La Pieta’ picture

Photo by  Mark Z. Saludes of UCAnews

Photo by Mark Z. Saludes of UCAnews

Proof of the greatness of a creation is the emotion that it evokes, favorable or unfavorable.

Such is the picture of Jennelyn Olaires cradling the dead body of her partner, Michael Siaron, a 30-year-old pedicab driver, who was shot dead by motorcycle-riding men while he was waiting for passengers past midnight of July 22 in Pasay City.

Inquirer captioned the heart-wrenching photo by Raffy Lerma, “La Pieta,” after the famous sculpture by Michelangelo Buonarroti of the sorrowful Mary holding the dead body of Jesus.

Lerma’s photo was a medium shot showing a partial view of the background, a sign, “Bawal magsakay at magbaba ng psahero dito” and cardboard sign with the word “pusher”, which news report said, was left by the killers.

A close-up version was posted online by photo journalist Mark Saludes of UCAnews.

Both Lerma and Saludes’ photos captured the anguish in the face of Olaires, whom news reports

ABC-CBN’s Basilio Sepe took a shot of the sorrowful moment from a higher angle conveying the feeling of smallness and helplessness of the couple.

The picture unnerved President Duterte who belittled is as “drama” in his first State of the Nation address last Monday.
“Eh tapos nandiyan ka nakabulagta and you are portrayed in a broadsheet na parang Mother Mary cradling the dead cadaver of Jesus Christ. Eh yan yang mga yan magda-dramahan tayo dito,” Duterte said.

Photo by Raffy Lerma of Philippine Daily Inquirer.

Photo by Raffy Lerma of Philippine Daily Inquirer.


Doubts about the photograph were raised in social media.

Musician and advertising executive Dennis Garcia said he sensed “something fishy with these shots,” referring to the many versions of the July 22 killing.

“why so many angles? staged with dramatic lighting? and no authorities in sight?inquiring minds want to know, Inquirer…” he asked.
Garcia further said, “in aid of destabilization?”

Sports broadcaster Manolo Chino Trinidad also voiced out his doubts about the too-perfect-to-be-true photograph with the following thoughts posted at 8:25 in his Facebook page.

“Ang tunay na drama sa likod ng litrato

“Kahit saan natin tignan ay walang paliwanag sa pagkamatay o pagpatay sa ating ka-anak. Ang drama dito ay kung paano nai-drawing ang kuha na sukat na sukat at may multiple angles pa.

“Eto ang imahe na sumasalamin sa katayuan ng Philippine Media—un klase na ginagamit para bilugin ang isipan ng sambayanan.”
Two hours after, Trinidad posted this:

“Binabawi ko ang sinabi ko kanina

“May nagpadala sa akin ng mensahe sa pamamagitan din nitong Facebook—isa sa mga tunay na tinataya ang buhay para lamang makakuha ng mga imahe na nailalaman ng ating mga pahayagan.

“Ang kuha na ito ni Raffy Lerma ng Philippine Daily Inquirer ay hindi raw drawing gaya ng aking nasabi kanina.

“Ang pakay daw dito ay makuha ang ‘honesty of the situation.’ Ang kumuha daw nito gaya ng ating mga photojournalists ay walang agenda kundi kunan ang napapanahong talakayan ng “extra-judicial killings.”

Trinidad shared the statement of Saludes, one of the photo-journalists who was at the scene of the crime.

Hoto by Basilio Sepe of  ABS-CBN.

Hoto by Basilio Sepe of ABS-CBN.

Saludes explained that the lighting;

“(It) was from floodlights (MMDA and Policemen who responded), ilaw ng mga TV Networks (ask GMA7, CNN, TV5 AND ABS-CBN who were there), flashlights from people who were looking at the crime scene (some were from cellphone flashlights), flash ng mga photojourn ng tabloids.”

Saludes further said: “Si Raffy Lerma walang dalang flash at hindi gumagamit ng flash tulad namin na nag-aral ng documentary photography. So sumasabay lahat ng walang ilaw sa kung anong available light.

“In fairness sa mga nakasama ko na photogs during that night, walang sumisigaw ng “ISA PA”. Lahat walang imik, hindi nagsasalita at nakikinig lang sa pagmamakaawa ng babae na tulungan ang asawa nya while trying to do our jobs.

“Totoo na maraming walang credibility sa industry natin, pero para gawing dahilan ito para ilayo ang issue ng extra judicial killings eh hindi naman yata tama.

“To think na inilabas din namin ang identity ng subjects sa frame.

“Nakakahiya naman siguro for fellow PJs na andun kung idrowing yan ni Raffy, ni Noel Celis, ni Eli Sepe, ni Linus Escandor, ni Vincent Go o ni Mark Saludes habang kagat-kagat ng eksenang iyan ang pansin at ulirat namin.

“Isama na ang puso.

“I am standing for Raffy and the rest of the PJs who were there.

“I am standing for photojournalism.

“Sa presscon lang uso ang sumisigaw ng “ISA PA” o ng “ATRAS KA NG KONTI ATE.”

“We are not just photographers, we are Photojournalists.”

Duterte’s war: Big kill of small fry, puny drugs haul, defies PNP rules

BANGKAY SA BANGKETA… kasi nga drug pusher ako.

This is the sad refrain in a sardonic poem that a young Filipina wrote and read in a video she posted last week on her Facebook page. It does not matter, she averred, that the so-called drug pushers falling by the dozens of late had not been read their rights or tried in court. Or even, that they had been killed by those who are supposed to protect them and enforce the law. Perhaps, she wrote, those who kill are drug pushers, too.

Indeed, a pall of death has cloaked the nation in mixed glee, grief, confusion, and anxiety in the first three weeks alone of the war on drugs of President Rodrigo R. Duterte, who will deliver his first state of the nation address today.

But who will be killed next is not quite clear as yet. In the meantime, the question of why the poor and puny pushers are dying in high numbers compared to just a handful of their rich counterparts, the drug lords, and their supposed coddlers in the police has been either inadequately answered or ignored.

By the data of the police — until now the singular source of information of the news media about the war on drugs — about 10 bodies have been showing up by the road and in the slums every day, or a total of 213 killed in Duterte’s first 21 days in office alone. The casualty toll includes 209 civilians and only four policemen that the police had tagged as alleged drug pushers.

Combatting drugs has always been a major police activity over the last seven years. Then and now, however, the PNP’s reports on the supposed “achievements” of the campaign have risen and fallen, across regions of the country.

By official PNP reports, Duterte’s war on drugs has netted much bigger numbers of those killed and arrested in its initial rollout period but also smaller seizures of drugs, by value and volume.

By all indications, however, Duterte’s war has assumed a random, free-for-all, brook-no-limits in law and due process, a kill-at-will campaign against mostly small-time drug suspects. This is happening despite the explicit rules of the 200-page Philippine National Police Handbook PNPM-Do-Ds-3-2-13 or Revised PNP Manual on Operational Procedures published in December 2013.

Cookie Diokno of the Free Legal Assistance Group of human rights lawyers says the big difference in the war on drugs then and now is this: Duterte’s war has flipped the “burden of proof” principle in the statutes inside out. In other words, says Diokno, “you are now presumed guilty, until proven innocent.”

Compared with data on the PNP’s anti-drug campaign in the 78 months from January 2010 to June 2016, Duterte’s three-week-old war has upped the numbers of alleged drug users and pushers killed and arrested multiple-fold.

The downside is Duterte’s war is unfolding with negligible documentation of the conduct of police operations and the death of suspects. In a majority of cases, the suspects were killed purportedly because they “resisted arrest” or tried to snatch the guns of and engaged arresting officers in a firefight.

Data from PNP’s Anti-Illegal Drugs Group (AIDG) in the 78 months before Duterte came to power, showed much lower numbers of casualties and arrests made, but also bigger values and volumes of drugs seized, compared to that recorded in the new government’s three-week war.

The 213 drug suspects killed under Duterte’s war from Jully 1 to 21, 2016 (an average of 10 persons a day) is a macabre figure compared to the 256 persons “killed in action” in the 78-month period or 2,336 days from January 2010 to June 2016 (an average of about one person every 10 days).

In the 78 months before Duterte, the PNP had conducted a total of 96,530 anti-drug operations, of which 46 percent were buy-bust operations; 28.4 percent “in flagrante” (the suspects were caught in the act); 16.1 percent via search warrant; 4.6 percent as checkpoint operations; 2.5 percent as “saturation drive”; 1.7 percent as “marijuana eradication” operations; 0.6 percent as “warrant of arrest”; and 0.1 percent as “interdiction.”

The PNP’s reports on Oplan Tokhang, though, do not offer data on how many of the various types of operations against illegal drugs have been conducted with mission orders, and which of these have been covered by search warrants or warrants of arrest. Many data fields in the PNP’s reports on the war on drugs prior to the Duterte administration do not appear anymore in its recent reports.

Yet another story should also raise grave concern among citizens. What drugs and substances, indeed, should be considered illegal?

Of the various types of drugs that the police had confiscated, over-the-counter substances and laboratory chemicals with legitimate but controlled uses have been enrolled, too. These include marijuana resin oil, rugby, Cytotec, ketamine, “Sulfuric,” sodium hydroxide, acetone, chloroform, palladium chloride, hydrochloric acid, Pseudoephedrine and Diazepam.

While most of the seized substances and drugs can only be bought in the black market, some items like hydrochloric acid (also known as muriatic acid), rugby, and acetone are easily available in sari-sari stores and hardware stores and are not on the list of illegal substances. Chemicals like chloroform and toluene are being used in research and industrial laboratories.— PCIJ, July 2016