A ‘new global nervous system’? They also call it The Net

THERE IS “a new information nervous system in the world today.” Its name, in a word: the Internet.

The Internet, according to Press Attache Bettina Malone of the United States Embassy in Manila, is a most important platform for free expression, telling stories, encouraging public discourse, and for exchange of ideas and entrepreneurship.

In her remarks at the opening today of the forum “Taking Stock, Taking Control: Freedom of Expression Online,” that PCIJ organized with assistance from the US Embassy Press Office, Malone cited the role of citizen journalists in the May 2013 elections.

“Citizen journalism is about citizens telling stories about their communities… stories that can be brought to the attention of those who make the decision,” she said.

“We have a new nervous system in the world,” she said, but also cited the need to expand Internet access and engagement with greater numbers of the population. “What about the ordinary citizens? are they aware of their freedom of expression?”

Malone said the US Embassy had first thought about supporting a public forum for citizen journalists to mark the observance of World Press Freedom Day last May 3. The Embassy later agreed to support the PCIJ’s pitch for a post-election activity that would tackle the role of social media in the May 2013 elections.

“Freedom of expression and an open exchange of ideas” are the ideas behind the conduct of the forum, she said. Citizen journalists must “help keep the freest press in Asia, free,” Malone said.

KL gov’t seizes opposition papers; cops poise ban on protest vigils

THE HOME MINISTER of Malaysia has confiscated copies of two major opposition publications Harakah and Suara Keadilan, in various states, the independent online newspaper Malaysiakini reported.

?Malaysiakini, quoting Harakah’s online news site, HarakahDaily, said copies of the party newspaper of PAS (Pan Malaysia Islamic Party) were said to have been seized in Malacca, Negri Sembilan, Kedah, and Perak.

A Twitter post, Malaysiakini said, also revealed that copies of newspaper of the PKR or People’s Justice Party of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim were also confiscated in four states on Thursday, May 23.

At the same time, Malaysiakini said a ban on the conduct of candle-light vigils is emerging.

“Politically-motivated candlelight vigils have reached a level where the police could no longer tolerate, Malaysiakini reported, adding that CPO Mohmad Salleh had urged people to “voice their grievances through legal channels instead.”

The marketing manager of Haraka Daily, Ahmad Faisal Tawang, had said he received calls from vendors in the morning, informing him that not only were ministry representatives seizing copies of the paper, were also raiding the vendors’ premises,” the Malaysiakini story said.

Tawang was also quoted as saying that copies of the paper’s Friday edition dated May 24-26, which featured the frontpage headline ‘GST hadiah BN untuk rakyat (GST is BN’s gift to the rakyat)’ were seized.

Malaysiakini said about 500 copies of the paper’s edition were allegdly seized in Malacca, and more than 1,000 were taken in Alor Setar, and Kedah.

KL crackdown: 2 opposition leaders arrested, sedition vs student activist

TWO opposition leaders in Malaysia were arrested separately today, May 23, for alleged sedition, over their role in protest actions over the ruling party’s supposed resort to fake ballots and other irregularities in the May 5, 2013 elections there, according to independent online newspaper Malaysiakini.

Those arrested were Tian Chua, an officer of the People’s Justice Party of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim; and Haris Ibrahim, leader of a rights activists group ABU or Anything But Umno.

Malaysiakini said the day-time arrest of Chua and Ibrahim were “believed to be in relation to a recent anti-electoral fraud forum in Kuala Lumpur.”

The arrest of Chua and Ibrahim came hours after prosecutors charged student leader Adam Adli, 24, with sedition for “seditious statements that included calling for people to ‘go down to the streets to seize back our power’ while addressing a political forum,” according to the Asian Wall Street Journal.

The newspaper said Adam had pleaded innocent at a Kuala Lumpur district court, was released on bail, and told to attend a hearing on July 2. If convicted, he faces a three-year jail term and a fine.

The Asian Wall Street Journal also reported that Chua managed to post on Twitter that “police detained him at an airport and told him he was being held for sedition.”

On the other hand, the newspaper said, “Mr. Haris was held separately, but it was not immediately clear what he was being investigated for.”

“After his arrest, Mr. Chua tweeted that Malaysians should not allow themselves to be ‘overtaken by fear (but should) continue to assemble peacefully and have faith,’” the newspaper added.

Last May 5, Malaysia held general elections that saw Prime Minister Najib Razak’s Barisan National Party, in power since 1957, winning by a slim majority. The party bagged 133 of the 222 parliamentary seats up for grabs.

In contrast, the three-party opposition coalition of former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim won only 89 seats, despite an 80-percent voter turnout.

Anwar, a personal friend of ousted Philippine president and now Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada, had called the poll results the worst in Malaysia’s history.

His coalition had frowned upon plans of followers to hold protest rallies but Anwar had been quoted in the news media as saying, “we must be allowed to express ourselves properly in stadiums or in the vicinity of a public space.”

Malaysia’s Sedition Act is a 1948 law that was enacted first by the colonial regime of British Malaya. It bans speech with “seditious tendency”, or which would “bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against” the government or engender “feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races”.

The Internet and freedom for all

STOCKHOLM, Sweden — Freedom for all, and all stakeholders speaking out with equal voice, on how to govern the Internet. Internet Freedom. Internet for Freedom.

These issues drive the two-day Stockholm Internet Forum 2013 (SIF13) that opens today, May 22 in this country that ranks top in the world for leveraging the potentials of the Internet, according to the latest Web Index.

The forum focuses on two themes — Internet Freedom and Security, and Internet Freedom and Development. Policymakers, netizens, techies, activists, and business and civil society representatives from 93 countries are participants.

(The PCIJ is attending the conference on invitation of the forum organizers, namely, the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, .Se or The Internet Infrastructure Foundation of Sweden, and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency or SIDA.)

At the reception for delegates on Tuesday, Fadi Chehade, president of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), called the Internet “a free gift for all the people.” It would thus be wrong for any one party, organization, or government to propose to control or govern it by itself, he said.

While some countries like the United States have played a big part in developing it, Chehade notes that even the US acknowledges that there is need everywhere for this “great resource.”

“No one organization, no one country, no one government, no one, period, can control the Internet,” he said. “And we must respect it and govern it like that.”

However, across nations and regions of the world, he noted that some parties have done “a pretty miserable job” of managing the Internet.

“The conundrum’ that confronts governments, civil society, academia, and business is precisely how to manage “this resources that spans the planet and crosses borders.”

The one and only one answer, he said, is that, “together, together” all stakeholders must do the job.

Yet, “it’s not just about multistakeholders, multiple parties coming together to work on an imopt resource.” More importantly, “it’s about multi-equal stakeholders. It’s having everyone at the table with equal voice participating in the governance of this resource.”

After all, the peoples of the developing world form the bulk of the Internet community. According to Chehade, of the 750 mllion people on Internet by 2005, 75 percent came form the developing world.

By 2015, at least 2 billion people are forecast to be on the Internet, and with over 70 percent or the next billion coming still from the developing world, he said.

Sadly, Chehade said people from less affluent nations are not yet fully engaged in managing and governing the Internet, even as “it something that they deserve… how to govern together the internet.”

Some governments seem to think that it is a task they must do. Chehade said a recent conversation he had with the leader of a Latin American country seems instructive.

“He told me: ‘It’s this simple, the Internet is very powerful, we are government, we love power, so the conclusion is we need to govern the Internet,’” Chehade said.

Still, the person was probably one of the more honest government officials he has met. Chehade said he was not speaking out to attack governments but “not all governments are created equal… (and) there are governments that do not understand multistakeholder development.”

For its part, ICANN has ceased being “just a money collector” and recently launched efforts to “change the DNA” of the organization.

ICANN, he said, now operates from Los Angeles in california, Istanbul in Turkey, and in Singapore, in its effort to grow into a global organization, and not just a US entity. “For too long,” he said, “ICANN has remained mostly a start-up in its mentality.”

“We are also pushing an internationalized domain name system and (to) diversify the domain name system,” he said.

In the same spirit of the Stockholm Internet Forum — Internet Freedom for Global Development,” Chehade said, “iCANN must embrace its public responsibility… be a publicly responsible organization” and “not just a money collector.”

“We have a role in enabling many parts of the Internet, and not just sit back and collect the change,” Cheahde said. “The new ICANN must embrace its responsibility to the public and to the developing world.”

Because he said he grew up “in places where freedom was not there… and lost many friends who spoke their mind,” Chehade said he realized early on that “freedom to choose is the most important thing.”

“The Internet has become the most powerful weapon for people to choose what they want,” he said. The Internet is “not only about democracy; it’s about allowing people to choose.”

Freedom from want, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the Internet enables all these and more freedoms, he said. “We have a responsibility to enable these freedoms close to the everyone in the world… let us all be leaders.”

The wealth of public officials, the weal of voters: Mismatch?

WHO ARE THE RICHEST elective officials of the Philippines, and who, the poorest?

Did they rise to greater affluence or fall to greater penury over the years?

And, is there a match or mismatch between the wealth of public officials, and the weal of the people they serve?

We have 10 days to go before the vote on May 13, 2013 so we better check it out now.
MoneyPolitics, a citizen’s resource tool on elections, public funds, and governance in the Philippines, may be of some assistance.

Click on its Public Profiles tab to learn about the numbers enrolled in the Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN) that top elective officials had filed, and subscribed and swore to as the facts of their wealth.

This tab offers full profiles on the wealth of the president, vice president, and senators.

Just as important this tab reveals the net worth of the party-list and district representatives, and the governors and vice governors of Philippine provinces.

These data came from the SALNs that PCIJ secured from the Office of the Ombudsman and other repository agencies.

But another tab, Elections and Governance will lead you to the lists of candidates in the 2013 elections and the voter turnout in the 2010 elections that PCIJ obtained from the Commission on Elections.

A page within this tab offers the latest socio-economic stats for the provinces, based on data from the National Statistical Coordination Board and the National Statistics Office, among other public agencies.

Why tap into these tabs?

The first, Public Profiles, might give us an initial KYC (Know Your Candidate) experience. Nothing wrong per se about candidates being rich but it is absolutely wrong in law for public officials to enrich themselves while in office.

The second, Elections and Governance, could give us our composite picture as communities, the living and working conditions of our people. It points to some bright spots, and many dark corners, in our country. It tells us what those aspiring to get elected on May 13, 2013 should address or speak about.

More than song and dance routines, perhaps we should demand that candidates tell us exactly how they intend to serve us better.

MoneyPolitics, a data journalism project of PCIJ, is just a click away.