The unraveling of President Benigno Aquino III

President Aquino in the New York Times interview

President Aquino in the New York Times interview


In a meeting with Vietnamese Defense Minister Gen. Phung Quang Thanh in August last year, President Aquino asked the visiting official how they are able to maintain good relations with China despite conflicting territorial claims.

(Despite a ferocious battle over the Paracels Islands in the South China Sea 40 years ago that killed more than 70 Vietnamese soldiers,China and Vietnam established a hotline to deal with fishery incidents in South China Sea waters following the meeting of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Vietnamese President Truong Tan Sang in Beijing last June.)

Thanh told Aquino that almost every day, personnel of Vietnamese Navy battle Chinese fishermen who venture into disputed areas in the South China. Arrests are made, diplomatic protests are filed. But, he said, “We don’t talk to media.”

For a while, Aquino seemed to have taken to heart the lesson from the Vietnamese defense minister. He was a voice of moderation when China’s sole aircraft carrier sailed to the South China Sea.

Even when the foreign office said the aircraft carrier’s presence in the West Philippine Sea raises tension, Aquino said, “Let’s not play it up. I think the Chinese themselves have admitted that this (Liaoning) is not yet fully operational. “

He kept his mouth shut when a Philippine newspaper reported that the Chinese ambassador said China will be establishing air defense identification zone or ADIZ over the West Philippine Sea. It was a wise decision because the report turned out to be erroneous.

But during the interview with New York Times last Tuesday, he changed demeanor and likened China’s leaders to Hitler.

In the article titled “Philippine Leader Sounds Alarm on China”, NY Times said Aquino “called on Tuesday for nations around the world to do more to support the Philippines in resisting China’s assertive claims to the seas near his country, drawing a comparison to the West’s failure to support Czechoslovakia against Hitler’s demands for Czech land in 1938.

“Like Czechoslovakia, the Philippines faces demands to surrender territory piecemeal to a much stronger foreign power and needs more robust foreign support for the rule of international law if it is to resist, President Aquino said in a 90-minute interview in the wood-paneled music room of the presidential palace.

“If we say yes to something we believe is wrong now, what guarantee is there that the wrong will not be further exacerbated down the line?” he said. He later added, “At what point do you say, ‘Enough is enough’? Well, the world has to say it — remember that the Sudetenland was given in an attempt to appease Hitler to prevent World War II.”

Agence France Presse reported on the NY Times story with the title “Philippine leader likens China’s rulers to Hitler.”

China’s Foreign Ministry has not issued a reaction on the provocative statement which could be an indication of how serious Beijing is taking it.

Another indication is a commentary by Xinhua writer Ming Jinwei calling Aquino “amateurish politician.”
The strongly- worded Xinhua commentary said “ Aquino, who has taken an inflammatory approach while dealing with maritime disputes with China, has never been a great candidate for a wise statesman in the region.”
Considered semi-official, the Xinhua commentary also said by comparing China to Nazi Germany, Aquino “exposed his true color as an amateurish politician who was ignorant both of history and reality.”

Usually a New York Times report is something makes Malacañang proud and happy. This time, they are acting defensive. Last Thursday, immediately after AFP story came out, Presidential Communications Operations Office Secretary Herminio Coloma said, “There will be no move on our part to explain (Aquino’s statement).”

Yesterday, Coloma had a lengthy and convoluted explanation when all that he wanted to say was it was not the intention of Aquino to offend Chinese leaders. “As a storyteller and as a conversationalist, the President often gives details of a particular situation so it could’ve happened that he was simply citing the fact that there was such incident,” he said.

Lawyer Harry L. Roque, Jr. who is director of the University of the Philippines Law Center Institute of International Legal Studies, said Aquino’s “Hitler” comments were “Totally uncalled for. “

He added: “While the Chinese maybe expansionists, they are certainly not genociders. The President, because we have initiated Arbitration, should no longer comment on the issues. Certainly calling our Chinese neighbors Nazi does not bode well for peaceful resolution of the dispute.”

Former diplomat Apolinario “Jun” Lozada, who headed the committee on foreign affairs when he was a congressman representing the 5th district of Negros Occidental, said, “It is a very unfortunate statement and I can only hope that it is not a basis of our international relation policy toward that country.

“I seriously believe that despite our serious political differences, we should endeavor to keep our bilateral relations and find the right approach to convince China to sit with us in the negotiating table to ease the problems and contribute to the stability and peace in the region.”

Former Ambassador to the United Nations Lauro Baja,Jr. said “The ‘Hitler statement’ of Pres. Aquino was unfortunate and should have been left unsaid. Now we are on the defensive again trying to explain what the President meant to say. “

Baja reminded Malacañang that the territorial disopute with China is now in the United Nationa Arbitral Tribunal and “statements like this may be taken into account by the judges one way or another.”

Baja said the Philippines should be more specific on what international support we want. “Otherwise we will be deluged with motherhood statements in their replies, even from so called allies.”

Lastly, he said, “ We should refrain from engaging China with tit for tat statements. After each tat we make on WPS, China will tat with actions showing that they exercise ‘effectivities’ in the area. Then we can only protest. We must be able to discern the difference between rhetoric and reality.”

Pride fuels standoff with Hongkong

The current standoff with Hongkong is an example of the danger of ignorance, power, and pride combined. As American minister Robert Fulghum said in his book,All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, “Ignorance and power and pride are a deadly mixture, you know.”

Hongkong Chief Executive CY Leung announces the lifting of no-visa privilege for Philippine government officials including diplomats.

Hongkong Chief Executive CY Leung announces the lifting of no-visa privilege for Philippine government officials including diplomats.

Last week, the Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying announced that the current 14-day visa-free arrangement for visiting Philippine diplomats and officials would be suspended starting Wednesday, February 5.

The sanction, which does not cover Filipinos who are going to Hongkong as tourists, is still over the Aug. 23, 2010 hostage- taking where eight Hongkong residents were killed after a disgruntled and desperate Filipino policeman hostaged a bus-load of Hongkong tourists at the Rizal Park in Manila.

In response, Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Secretary Raul Hernandez issued the government position of no apology, just regret.

Hernandez mentioned about “ generous offering” by the Philippine government to the victims’ families but, he said, “ a total renegotiation has been opened by the Hong Kong SAR Government to seek a demand for an apology which the Philippines, as a sovereign nation, is not prepared to consider. Our Nation has already expressed its deepest regret and condolences over the incident and we are preparing to reiterate this.”

For the Aquino government, Hernandez said, “substantive closure on the Quirino Grandstand Incident had already been arrived at three years ago with the previous Hong Kong SAR Government and the victims as well as their families.

“A renewed appeal for compassion was directly made to our government last October 2013. We responded to this appeal without equivocation and in a most generous manner. Additional tokens of solidarity have therefore been pledged by the Filipino people at the behest of the Philippine government. These amounts that are being offered are substantially more than those that have been previously accepted by the victims and their families. We have been made to understand that the victims and their families have agreed to this offer.”

25 persons mostly Hongkong tourists were inside this bus.

25 persons mostly Hongkong tourists were inside this bus.

The DFA statement further said, “To bring the issue to its final conclusion, the Philippines remains committed to manifest compassion for the victims and their families and is ready to turn over the additional tokens of solidarity from the Filipino people. We hope that we will be able to do this as soon as possible.”

The Aquino government apparently does not get, or refuses to accept, what the Hongkong government had been saying the past three years: “It’s not the money. It’s the act of apologizing that we want to see because that will prove that you are really sorry for what happened.”

President Aquino has a somewhat warped reason why his government is not apologizing to Hongkong for what has been seen by the whole world on TV as the greatest show of government incompetence in handling a crisis.

On the sidelines of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Bali, Indonesia, Hongkong’s Leung met with Aquino and reiterated their demand for an apology saying that in their culture, , they apologize for unfortunate incidents in their territory involving other nationals even though the government is not directly responsible.

Aquino said, “So sabi ko, that’s your culture. You practice those, that’s your system. But in our system iyong… we cannot admit wrongdoing if it’s not ours… From our perspective, there is one lone gunman responsible for this tragedy.”

A smiling Aquino during the press conference on the hostage crisis angered people of Hongkong.

A smiling Aquino during the press conference on the hostage crisis angered people of Hongkong.

He said, “we only apologize when we admit that we are at fault as a country, as a government, and as a people.”

It must really be difficult for Aquino to admit that it was his government’s bungling of the rescue operations that caused the death of the eight Hongkong tourists.

If he would care to read again the report of the De Lima-led Incident Investigation and Review Committee of the hostage taking, he would see the words “incompetence” and phrases “neglect of duty” mentioned several times referring to officials of the government.

Leung said lifting of visa- free privileges for government officials is just the “first phase of sanctions” and said they may take more action if it thought it could be “effective” in securing an apology over the hostage-taking.

Actually this “first phase of sanctions” is a downgraded version of what was approved by the Hongkong Legislative Council last November which was removal of visa-free access for Filipinos. They apparently thought of its adverse effect on their tourism.

Filipino officials are confident Hongkong would not stop the employment of Filipino domestic helpers, who number about 150,000. The Chinese know the folly of cutting off your nose to spite your face.

It’s the Philippine officials who need to be reminded that “When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with the humble is wisdom.”

That’s from Proverbs 11:2.

PNoy, Ramon Ang and Zenaida Ducut

ERC Chair Ducut has a very influential patron.

ERC Chair Ducut has a very influential patron.


Two lawmakers who are allies of President Aquino last week filed with the Office of the President a complaint against Chairperson Zenaida Ducut of the Energy Regulatory Commisssion accusing her of failure to protect the interest of the consumers when it approved last December Meralco’s application for a staggering P4.15/kilowatt-hour increase.

“Respondent is guilty of gross neglect of duty by tacitly approving, without the barest hint of due process, the unprecedented generation charges Meralco sought to pass on to consumers in the months of December 2013, February 2014 and March 2014,” Akbayan Partylist Representatives Walden Bello and Ibarra Gutierrez said in their complaint.

It would be interesting to see how Malacañang will handle the complaint considering that last December in Tokyo, Aquino confessed being powerless about the unconscionable increase because he said, “ERC does not report to us, they are independent of us.”

Feeling the public’s anger over the huge power rate increase, Malacañang has since backtracked from its hands-off policy and has ordered an investigation on the suspected collusion by power players to manipulate the energy prices.

Bello and Gutierrez have focused on Ducut, a Gloria Arroyo appointee, whose term at the regulatory agency is still up to 2015.

The two lawmakers said Malacañang can suspend Ducut. But Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma said that could take time. “There will now be a process to establish if there’s sufficient basis for the allegations against her. And it’s justifiable that she’s afforded a chance to explain her actions. So far what we have been hearing are allegations coming from the opposing side,” he said.

Bello and Gutierrez suggested another option for Ducut: resignation. But the ERC Chair refused saying, “The professionalism and reputation of the entire ERC organization is at stake here and I will not abandon but will lead my people to what is proper and appropriate. “

President Aquino and SMC chief at the launch of MMSkyway 3

President Aquino and SMC chief at the launch of MMSkyway 3

Coloma, however, said the option of resignation is something “being looked into by observers.”

If there’s somebody who can convince Ducut to resign it should be Ramon Ang, president and chief operating officer of San Miguel Corporation.

A reliable source said Ang was instrumental in the installation of Ducut at the ERC which should be something to be concerned about because San Miguel, with its SMC Global Power Holdings Corp., is one of the major players in the energy sector.

Many have wondered why Ducut was not included in Aquino’s “Tuwid na Daan” sweep like he did with former Chief Justice Renato Corona and former Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez considering the ERC chief’s checkered background. According to Inquirer columnist Randy David, “Before she was plucked out of anonymity in 1995 to run as representative of Pampanga’s second district, ERC Chair Zenaida Cruz-Ducut had worked as a lawyer for Bong Pineda, Central Luzon’s alleged “jueteng” lord and kingmaker. Her undistinguished career in Congress spanned nine years, ending in 2004. She ran under Danding Cojuangco’s Nationalist People’s Coalition in 1998, but transferred to Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s party after the latter seized the presidency in 2001. Zeny Ducut promptly became GMA’s loyal minion, avidly campaigning for her in the presidential election of 2004 and supporting her son Mikey Arroyo’s bid for the congressional seat she had occupied for nine years.”

Ducut is also implicated by pork barrel scam whistleblower Benhur Luy in the malversation case filed before the Ombudsman. Luy said Ducut demanded a five-percent commission for every Priority Development Assistance Fund project she delivered to pork barrel scam operator Janet Napoles.

With Ramon Ang as patron, Ducut indeed is “nakasandal sa pader.”

Last week, at the inauguration of the Tarlac City-Gerona-Paniqui section of the Tarlac-Pangasinan-La Union Expressway project, built and operated by Private Infra Dev Corp. Inc. an SMC unit, the President addressed the SMC head as “Siyempre, ating idol po si Mr. Ramon Ang.”

The country was spared the stress of an impeachment trial with the resignation of former Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez. Someone close to both Aquino and Gutierrez brokered the latter’s resignation.

Will Aquino ask his idol to do the same with Ducut?

Liars all

He is not the epitome of intelligence and good public service but his story about the breakfast meeting is revealing of  Malacañang's methods under Aquino.

He is not the epitome of intelligence and good public service but his story about the breakfast meeting is revealing of Malacañang’s methods under Aquino.

Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla, Jr., one of the three senators charged with plunder before the Ombudsman in connection with alleged anomalous use of Priority Development Assistance Fund, related Monday an incident that took place in December 2012, a few days before the conclusion of the impeachment of ousted Chief Justice Renato Corona.

Revilla said Roxas, who was then secretary of Transportation and Communication, invited him to a morning meeting at his residence in Cubao. From there, they went to Malacañang’s Bahay Pangarap, Aquino’s residence, with Roxas driving the SUV and he was seated at the back seat.

Revilla said Roxas had the license plate of the SUV removed.

At Bahay Pangarap, they were joined first by and Budget Secretary Florencio “Butch” Abad and later by President Aquino. They were served breakfast and he remembered everything on the table: pan de sal, kesong puti, egg, ham, dried beef, friend rice and fruits. The main fare was Corona.

There was no hiding his  obsession against Corona.

There was no hiding his obsession against Corona.

Revilla said the President appealed to him: “Parang awa mo na, pare, balato mo sakin ito. Kelangan ko siyang ma-impeach.”

Abad, he said, chimed in: “Let’s help each other, Senator.”

He said he replied: “Mr. President, I will do what is right. I believe that we should fight for what is right, and I will do what is right for the country.”

Revilla was one of the 20 senators who voted “Guilty” to the charge of betrayal of public trust against Corona.
Aquino and Roxas both confirmed the meeting with Revilla but they had different versions of what took place in that meeting.

Communications Secretary Herminio Coloma said the President denied having uttered the words, “balato mo sa akin ito…”

Coloma said, “The President met with Senator Revilla “to verify persistent reports that senators were being pressured by interest groups to influence the outcome of the [Corona] impeachment trial, and he asked the senator to decide the case on the basis of its merits.”

Boy Pick-up

Boy Pick-up

Roxas also issued a statement: “Senator Bong and I used to be in the Senate together. So, when he said he had some issues to discuss with the President, which included the cityhood of Bacoor and his being head of the Lakas Party, I found a way to set up their meeting.

“At the time, the President was not in Malacañan and was at Bahay Pangarap. So as not to disrupt the detail of the PSG and so Senator Bong won’t be inconvenienced, I personally drove him to Bahay Pangarap.

“He lied when he said that I removed my license plate before we went to Bahay Pangarap. I really don’t use an official plate. It’s not attached to my vehicle. I use a regular plate issued by the LTO. The people who have known me for a long time know that I have never used the 8 plate when I was congressman, the 7 plate when I was Senator, or the 6 plate as Cabinet Secretary. I have never attached such plates to my car.”

They are all lying.

Some of the details of each statement are true, some are false. Halftruths are lies.

Aquino was never shy about his desire to remove Corona as part of his reform agenda. Corona’s ouster was a major achievement for him.

Everybody knows they moved heaven and earth to get rid of Corona and the public applauded him for that. To say that Aquino did not meddle in the impeachment of Corona is a big lie.

For Roxas to say that the meeting was not related to the Corona impeachment is a lie.

Revilla is also lying when he said that his vote was about “doing what is right for the country.” He got his reward for his Corona vote for at least P50 million in the form of the Disbursement Acceleration Program. How did he spend that huge sum of money plus his other PDAF?

Don’t BS us about “doing right for the country.” You are lining your pockets with our money. That’s not right for the country.

You are all liars.

A celibate Kris Aquino as president will eradicate poverty in PH

Kris shares with Boy Abunda her  theory about her success.

Kris shares with Boy Abunda her theory about her success.

I cannot imagine the Philippines without Kris Aquino. It would be boring.

I want Kris Aquino for President.

Everybody talks about the need for out-of-the box solutions to the problem of poverty that is the lot of almost a third of the country’s 99 million population. Kris Aquino has found the solution: don’t have sex and you will be blessed with money beyond your dreams.

In an interview last Tuesday with best friend Boy Abunda in her classy all-white house, Aquino couldn’t contain her joy for all the blessings coming her way: the box-office success of the movie of her son, Bimby, even if critics said it was inane (one critic said it was “contempt for the audience”); a hefty new contract with ABS-CBN after she floated the rumor that she was considering the job offer of businessman Manny V. Pangilinan to head TV5; plus many more.

These are her choice quotes:

“Ngayon ko na-realize pala talaga na it’s possible na ‘yung kaligayahan mo it doesn’t come pala from fulfillment sa sarili but it comes from seeing people loving your child. Sinabi ko nga, nagdarasal ako, ‘God, ano ba ang nagawa kong bongga para ibigay mo ito kay Bimb?’ Kasi hindi ba nasa Biblia ‘yon na kung ano ang itanim mo bilang magulang ‘yon ang aanihin ng anak. So sabi ko, ‘Thank you God.’”

“Kasi siguro mabait ako, kasi siguro celibate ako, sorry I have to say, let’s be honest. … I’m just saying na siguro parang alam ko kung ano ang priorities in life ko and siguro talaga kung ano ang pinakamahalaga sa iyo, ‘yun ang ipagkakaloob sa iyo ng Diyos at ang pinakamahalaga sa akin ay ‘yung dalawang anak ko.”

“I know my priorities siguro kaya na bi-blessed because I don’t have sex.”

Let’s try to follow Kris’ logic: she is blessed –so rich, she is one of the country’s top taxpayers – because she is mabait. That means the Filipinos living in poverty with no roof over their heads, the children scavenging for food are not mabait.


She said she is blessed because she doesn’t have sex. That means all those poor people are having an active sex life. And all those who are having an active sex life are not blessed.

Such genius. Only a Kris Aquino could have come up with that theory.

So if Kris becomes president, she will be a good example of population control. No sex, no more children. We will all be rich and blessed. Hurray! Kris Aquino for President.

With Kris Aquino in Malacañang, there will be complete transparency (who needs the Freedom of Information law?). Nothing will be taboo for her: from the color of her underwear (In her “Morning Girls” show with Korina Sanchez in 2004, she even revealed without any prodding the color of her panty) to her quarrels with her lovers (In 2003, she related on TV her bedroom fight with live-in partner, actor Joey Marquez. She said “Sinasabi nila that I grabbed at his genitals. I did. I wanted to crush it.”)

You would think her “Joey,you gave me STD” would be difficult to top? You will be surprised with what Kris can come up with in the future.

With Kris Aquino as president, it will not only be more fun in the Philippines. It will be a much-blessed Philippines.