ALERT: Thai military cancels forum

On media landscape in Thailand

We are reposting this article originally published on the website of the Southeast Asian Press Alliance

A MEDIA forum in Bangkok scheduled last ?Friday to launch a report measuring the Thai media landscape was cancelled following an order of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO).

The NCPO, which staged a military coup d’etat to end the country’s political impasse on May 22, 2014, reportedly told organizers ?two days earlier that the event may touch on controversial content that can have repercussions for the military junta’s ongoing effort to restore peace and order.

The German political foundation Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), together with the Thai Journalists Association (TJA), were scheduled to launch the Asia Media Barometer: Thailand 2014 on Friday 30 January.

TJA vice president Manop Thip-osod said the NCPO’s concerns were understandable, but it should have been more circumspect of whether a press conference would have the potential to inflame tensions, as the military suggested.The cancellation of a forum on media freedom, raises “concern over basic rights to expression” and “a loss of opportunity” to hear academic research, Manop said.

seapa-logo

The last minute cancellation of the event came about amid growing criticisms in the media and by other countries of the six-month-old government, led by coup leader Gen Prayuth Chan-o-cha in handling justice and national reconciliation as well as the reform process.

However, the verbal military order to “postpone indefinitely” the launch was made by phone to FES and the forum venue on January 28. By that time however, the summary of the report has already been widely circulated.

“Stopping the report’s launch is rather unfortunate,” said Gayathry Venkiteswaran, SEAPA executive director.

“The opportunity for a more nuanced understanding of the media landscape in Thailand was lost, as it could have provided a good starting point for media reform.” she explained.

The cancellation order comes in the wake of widespread criticism of the cabinet’s proposal for 10 controversial bills on the digital economy seen to institutionalize restrictions on online freedom of expression and violate the right to privacy of citizens.

Stakeholder report

FES’s second report measures the media landscape and conditions in Thailand between 2011-2014. It rated the Thai media situation at 2.475, dropping from the 2.7 from the first report in 2010, which is also a year of political turbulence that saw a violent government crackdown on the pro-Thaksin political movement.

The findings showed the imposition of martial law and the military coup d’etat on 22 May 2014 have had a major impact on the lower score on Thailand’s media freedom and freedom of expression.

FES, which focuses on democracy, labour rights and freedom of expression, among other issues, releases this report periodically, and has produced its analysis with national stakeholders for a number of countries.

Scoring, with 5 as the highest, is based on a measurement of four key components that influence the media industry: protection of media freedom and freedom of expression, media diversity and sustainability, independence and fairness in media regulation, and high professional standards.

The scorers represent media stakeholders in Thailand, including media professional groups, individual journalists, academics as well as a representative of Southeast Asia Press Alliance (SEAPA).

The FES report states that the Thai media has undergone rapid changes over the past five years, having been shaped and directed by major political changes between 2010 and 2014.

[For more information, please contact SEAPA, seapa@seapa.org, +66 2 243 5579. This Alert report also appears in our website at http://www.seapa.org/?p=10725.]

Tragic 2014: 66 journalists killed, 119 kidnapped, 178 jailed – RWB

THE WORLD in 2014 has been most bloody and most cruel to both journalists and citizen-journalisis.

In all, according to Reporters Without Borders (RWB or Reporters Sans Frontieres), the numbers are most grave:

* Killed: 66 journalists, 19 citizen-journalists, and 11 media workers
* Kidnapped: 119 journalists and 8 citizen-journalists
* Imprisoned: 178 journalists and 178 citizen-journalists
* Arrested: 853 journalists and 122 citizen-journalists
* Threatened and attacked: 1,856 journalists.

RWB, in its latest “Round-up of Abuses Against Journalists” noted a slight fall in the number of journalists killed in connection with their work, but also “an evolution in the nature of violence against journalists and the way certain kinds, including carefully-staged threats and beheadings, are being used for very clear purposes.”

According to RWB, “the murders are becoming more and more barbaric and the number of abductions is growing rapidly, with those carrying them out seeking to prevent independent news coverage and deter scrutiny by the outside world.”

RWB said “the beheadings of US and Iraqi journalists in 2014 testified to the scale of the violence that can be used against unwanted witnesses. Rarely have reporters been murdered with such a barbaric sense of propaganda, shocking the entire world.”

The 66 professional journalists killed in connection with their work in 2014 was 7 percent fewer than in 2013.

About 93 percent of those killed were salaried journalists, and 7 percent freelancers. Ninety percent of those killed were foreign journalists, and 10 percent, local journalists.

However, RWB said two-thirds of the casualties in 2014 were killed in war zones, including Syria (which continues to the world’s deadliest country for journalists), the Palestinian Territories (especially Gaza), eastern Ukraine, Iraq and Libya.

The number of journalists kidnapped in 2014, or 119, marked a 30 percent increase from the 2013 figure of 87.

Of those abducted in 2014, RWB said 90 percent are local journalists. To this day, at least 40 journalists and three citizen-journalists are still being held hostage across the world. Of the 22 journalists currently being held by armed groups in Syria, 16 are Syrians. All of the eight journalists currently held hostage in Iraq are Iraqis.

Most of the kidnapping cases were in the Middle East and North Africa, with 29 in Libya, 27 in Syria and 20 in Iraq. The chief causes were Islamic State’s offensive in Iraq and Syria, and the turmoil in Libya, where the clashes between rival militias have not let up.

Many journalists have also been kidnapped in Ukraine, mainly in the east of the country, where the conflict continued despite the ceasefire announced there in September.

Of the 853 journalists arrested in 2014, RWB said at least 47 were working in Ukraine, 46 in Egypt, 45 in Iran, 45 in Nepal, 34 in Venezuela, and 636 in the rest of the world.

Of the 178 professional journalists in prison as of Dec. 8, 2014, at least 29 are working in China, 28 in Eritrea, 19 in Iran, 16 in Egypt, 13 in Syria, and 73 in the rest of the world. Exactly the same number or 178 citizen-journalists were recorded by RWB to be in prison worldwide as of the same date.

In the face of “such diverse forms of intimidation,” RWF said, “twice as many Journalists had fled into exile this year as in 2013.” A total of 139 professional journalists and 20 citizen-journalists contacted RWB and said they had to flee abroad in 2014 for fear of their safety. Of the total, 43 came from Libya, 37 from Syria, and 31 from Ethiopia.

RWB said two developments deserve highlighting:

* Fewer journalists were killed in countries “at peace,” notably in Mexico, India and Philippines; and

* The number of women journalists killed doubled, from three last year to six this year.

The women journalists were killed in Central African Republic, Iraq, Egypt, Afghanistan and Philippines. A woman citizen-journalist was also killed in Mexico after being kidnapped by gunmen.

By country, the most deadly places for journalists in 2014, according to RWB, are: Syria, where 15 journalists were killed in 2014; Palestine, 7; Ukraine, 6; Iraq, 4; and Libya, 4. In the rest of the world, 30 other journalists had been killed.

RWB said the top five countries where the largest numbers of journalists had been arrested and jailed in 2014 are: China, 29; Eritrea, 28; Iran, 19; Egypt, 16; and Syria, 13. In the rest of the world, 73 other journalists had been imprisoned.

The top five countries were the largest numbers of journalists had been kidnapped in 2014 are: Ukraine, 33; Libya, 29; Syria, 27; Iraq, 20; and Mexico, 3. In the rest of the world, 4 other journalists had been kidnapped.

Five cases marked the degree of terror that journalists confronted in 2014, according to RWB. These are the cases of:

* Raad Azaoui: An Iraqi cameraman working for Sama Salah Aldeen TV, Raad Mohamed Al-Azaoui was publicly executed on 10 October for refusing to cooperate with Islamic State, which tolerates only dead or compliant journalists. Aged 36 and a father, he was executed together with his brother and two other civilians in the IS-controlled Iraqi city of Samara a month after being captured along with around 20 other Iraqis. IS had announced its intention to execute him ever since his abduction.

* Gao Yu. Well-known Chinese journalist Gao Yu, 70, is being tried on a charge of divulging state secrets to German public broadcaster Deutsche Welle. At her first hearing, on 21 November in Beijing, she pleaded not guilty, thereby retracting the forced confession that CCTV News broadcast in May. The first journalist to receive UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Prize in 1997, Gao has already spent seven years in prison. If found guilty, she could be facing a 15-year sentence.

* Khadija Ismaïlova. An investigative journalist who has covered high-level corruption, Khadija Ismayilova has been detained since 5 December. She feared she might be arrested but nothing could convince this media freedom symbol to leave the country for which she has fought for years with rare courage and persistence. Her reporting and defence of human rights turned her into a priority target for the government. In 2012 and 2013 she was the victim of a smear campaign and blackmail attempts with a sex tape. The pressure intensified this year, when she was accused of spying, charged with defamation, arrested and prevented from travelling abroad. And now, finally, she is being held on the absurd charge of “pushing” a former colleague to attempt suicide, a charge that carries a possible sentence of three to seven years in jail.

* James Foley: On 19 August, Islamic State released a horrifying video of US hostage James Foley being beheaded. Foley, 40, was a reporter for the Global Post news website and Agence France-Presse. Posted online, the carefully staged video was designed to put pressure on the US government and included a threat to similarly execute Steven Sotloff, a US journalist held in Syria since the summer of 2013. A video of Sotloff being dispatched in the same way was released exactly two weeks later.

* Raef Badawi: A Saudi citizen-journalist and winner of the 2014 Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Prize, Raef Badawi has been held since 2012 on a charge of “insulting Islam” for promoting liberal ideas on his website, the Liberal Saudi Network. Aged 30 and the father of three children, he was sentenced by a Riyadh court in September to 10 years in prison, 1,000 lashes and a heavy fine. In response to this inhuman sentence, which violates international law, RWB has launched a petition calling on King Abdullah to pardon him.

Since 1995, RWB has been publishing its annual round-up of violence and abuses against journalists that RWF “based on precise data that RWB gathers in the course of its monitoring.” It includes figures for both professional and citizen-journalists killed in connection with their reporting. RWB continues to investigate cases when it has not yet gathered enough information to reach a clear determination.

#IJAsia14 ends, but solidarity sparks new beginnings for Asia

SALAMAT PO. Domo arigato. Terimah Kasih. Thank you.

More than 300 delegates from 33 countries, 30 learning sessions, countless ideas, and stronger solidarity among journalists – all these in only two days.

Even good things must come to end. Or better still, spark new beginnings.

For starters, we are now taking small, steady steps to give birth to an Investigative Journalism Network for Southeast Asia, while our colleagues in South Asia, and in China and Hong Kong press on with parallel efforts at collaboration.

The editors and staff of the PCIJ would like to thank all those who have been part of Uncovering Asia: The First Asian Investigative Journalism Conference.

THank you, too, for the trust and friendship that the Global Investigative Journalism Network and all of you have reposed in PCIJ.

We hope to see you all again, online or in the next conference.

To know more about the PCIJ, we invite you to view this video short.

Investigative journ still needed in Asia

By Julius D. Mariveles

IT IS as certain as the sun rising in the East: investigative journalism is still needed in Asia.

Not only that Asia is home to more than 4.3 billion people or 60 percent of the global population, it is also here where democracies are emerging, some teetering on the brink of reverting to dictatorships, amid a changing global order.

More than 300 journalists pondered over this issue on the second day of Uncovering Asia: The First Asian Investigative Journalism Conference in the capital city of Manila, the Philippines.

“There’s a niche for investigative journalism, there’s still a need for it,” Kunda Dixit, founder and editor of the Nepali Times, said in opening the discussion, The Future of Investigative Journalism in Asia.

Investigative journalism still has a niche, Kunda Dixit says | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Investigative journalism still has a niche, Kunda Dixit says | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Dixit, one of the leading senior journalists in Asia, also said that while investigative journalism is still needed, there are lot of problems “stacked up against us,” including the over-commercialisation of media and publishers and owners who have “skeletons in their closets who don’t want to cast the first stone” against government wrongdoing.

“If mainstream media are too squeamish to do investigative journalism, we have other options,” he added.

Leading investigative journalists in the regions who were part of the panel led in weighing in on the issue.

Sashi Kumar of India | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Sasha Kumar of India | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Sashi Kumar, chairperson of the Asian College of Journalism in Asia, said there is a growing “scam fatigue” among people in India who are being treated to reports about officials being involved in issues of corruption but these reports are short-lived and not pursued.

Kumar pointed out that while 60 to 70 percent of the population of India live in rural areas, mainstream media hardly cover people in these places. He cited as an example the high rate of suicide among farmers in rural India that has been hitting the headlines yet there is no “real and sustained investigation of the causes.”

“The news media is part of the problem, not the solution by virtue of its ownership,” he added.

Ying Chin: Doing IJ still very risky in Hongkong and China | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Ying Chin: Doing IJ still very risky in Hongkong and China | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Hongkong University journalism professor Ying Chan, on the other hand, said doing investigative journalism in Hongkong and China remains “very risky” since journalists could lose their freedom.

She also noted that while Hongkong has many tycoons and billionaires, there is “no real support for good journalism” as she added that there is still a need for more training and the building of local data bases.

But while independent media is mostly doing investigative journalism in most parts of Asia, Tomohisa Yamaguchi of Asahi Shimbun in Japan said mainstream news outlets like their paper are doing IJ work.

IMG_2392

Tomohisa Yamaguchi of Asahi Shimbun | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

In fact, investigative journalism has already overthrown three prime ministers in Japan, a substantial number compared to only one in the United States.

Yamaguchi is deputy editor of Asahi’s investigative reports section that was, ironically, nearly shuttered several years ago.

Another problem facing journalists in Asia is the lack of freedom of information or access to information laws that could hamper the work of investigative journalists.

IMG_2393

Filipino journalist John Nery asks: what would be the form of investigative reports in the future? | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Chavarong Limpattamapanee, editor of Thai Rath, said while Thailand has an FOI law, it still needs to be reformed. In Japan, on the other hand, Yamaguchi said that FOIs started as local laws before it became a national one. Interestingly, the push for local information laws was initiated not only by journalists but by lawyers and housewives.

The form of investigative reporting could also change, a discussion triggered by the question of Filipino editor John Nery of the Philippine Daily Inquirer who said that investigative reporting could change from the usual written long form to a different one, including, interestingly, a video game.

A forum participant stresses a point during the discussion on the future of investigative journalism in Asia | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

A forum participant stresses a point during the discussion on the future of investigative journalism in Asia | Photo by Julius D. Mariveles

Ying Chan said all media must be used to engage people of any age. She said this requires journalists who can talk to coders or programmers who can translate story-telling to other forms.

Dixit added that investigative journalism can also contribute to the commercial success of a paper.

“It can improve the credibility of a news outlet and improved credibility means more readership.”