How did OP, Senate spend P689M?

By Charmaine P. Lirio

WHEN Ma. Gracia Pulido-Tan assumed her post as chairperson of the Commission on Audit (COA) in 2012, she alerted officials on the huge amounts of unliquidated cash advances (CAs) in many agencies.

Pulido-Tan’s term has already ended yet still the problem she pointed out early on still persists, even in the Office of the President and the Senate.

Recently released COA agency audit reports show that between themselves alone, the Office of the President (OP) and the Senate have unliquidated cash advances of a combined total of P689.53 million.

The OP has P452.61 million P436.93 million of unsettled CAs, of which P436.93 million were amounts incurred by from the time of deposed president Ferdinand Marcos to detained president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

To be sure, the COA report indicates that the OP under Benigno S. Aquino III has the highest settlement rate among the presidents, it still had to settle P11 million in unliquidated cash advances.

The Senators were not as exemplary. COA said they have P252.6 million in outstanding cash advances as of December 2013.

To make matters worse, the COA reports mote that officials in the OP and the Senate have been granted further cash advances even though they have not yet settled the prior amounts that had been entrusted to them. Such practice is contrary to the rules of COA and Presidential Decree No. 1445 or the Auditing Code of the Philippines.

The COA report enrolled the Senate’s reply to the audit observation: “[The management] stated that the Senators had already submitted their liquidation documents but these are not yet recorded in the books of accounts pending review of all supporting documents.”

Cash advances are given to officials for instances where payment by check is difficult, impractical or impossible. According to COA rules, CAs may be granted for salaries and wages, commutable allowances, honoraria, petty operating expenses, as well as current operating expenditures of agency field offices and official travel expenditures.

Section 89 of the Auditing Code states that cash advances have to be reported and liquidated as soon as the purpose for which they were issued has been served. Officials with unsettled or unliquidated previous CAs are also not allowed to receive additional advances until they submit a proper accounting of the funds.

CAs are settled either by the return of the money if unspent, or by the presentation of proper vouchers, receipts or evidence of payment showing details of how the CAs were used.

Failure to render accounts for public funds is a criminal offense punishable with imprisonment of up to six years under the Revised Penal Code.

Likewise, if a public official in charge of public funds or property fails to have such funds or property “duly forthcoming” upon demand by an authorized officer like auditors from the COA, the law presumes that the crime of malversation has been committed.

It “shall be prima facie evidence that [the officer] has put such missing funds or property to personal use.”

Do nothing with P1.4-B donation?

WHEN super typhoon Yolanda struck and cut a wide swath of destruction in November 2013, the Aquino administration scrambled for funds for emergency assistance for the affected communities. It rushed to Congress to secure a supplemental budget.

But the Palace actually had money that it could have used pronto, but had not touched for years.

In fact, according to the Commission on Audit (COA), Malacañang at the time could’ve tapped another source of fund for the victims of calamities: a billion-peso donation that it received almost 25 years ago.

In its 2013 Agency Audit Report released last February, COA said that there remains an unutilized amount of P1.4 billion lodged under the Office of the President (OP).

The fund came from Benpress Corporation in the form of a 1990 donation of Meralco (Manila Electric Co.) shares to the OP. The shares were sold in 2008 and recorded under the Office of the President’s accounts only in 2010.

The Deed of Donation, according to the COA report, indicated that the amount “could be used by the Donee (OP) in such projects in economic development according to a national priority plan as it may determine such as agrarian reform, assistance to victims and areas affected by the recent earthquake and rehabilitation of depressed areas.”

In truth, the OP did not lack for opportunities to spend the donation.

As COA noted that in the years after the amount’s appearance in the OP’s accounts, the country suffered great damage and losses from various calamities yet the fund was not touched. In 2013, Yolanda, regarded as the strongest typhoon to make landfall, hit the Philippines and affected 14.1 million Filipinos. (See PCIJ’s stories on Disaster Aid)

In its report, COA reiterated its 2012 recommendation to the OP to prepare a Special Budget “taking into consideration the purpose of the said donation… in order to utilize the funds for the benefit of the constituents especially those severely affected by national calamities.” – Charmaine P. Lirio, PCIJ, March 2015

A bucket list for PNoy presidency: FOI, Mamasapano, BBL & more

IN THE TWILIGHT of his presidency, what “unfinished priorities” should top the bucket list of Benigno S. Aquino III’s administration?

To the captains of business like Ramon del Rosario, chairman of the Makati Business Club, a few urgent and important things should command the administration’s unqualified attention in its last 16 months in office.

Del Rosario, in a speech he delivered on Tuesday at the Fourth Arangkada Philippines Anniversary Forum in Makati City, posits a fairly long list of what he called the “priority measures of the business community for 2015-2016.”

He may be faulted for the volume and verbiage of his proposals but possibly not for speaking out. Del Rosario was among the top businessmen who had supported Aquino from when he launched his bid for the presidency, and throughout his 56 months in power.

In del Rosatio’s mind, in his final months, the Aquino administration would do well to:

* Pass the Freedom of Information law, a “most critical” piece of legislation “to institutionalize the gains of the last 56 months” and to nurture “a culture of transparency and accountability” in the public sector.

* Bring the Bangsamoro Basic Law back on legislative track quickly, carry out the peace process to fruition, but also render a “dull accounting” of the “complete facts surrounding the Mamasapano incident” to meet the demands of justice.

* Amend “the restrictive economic provisions of the Constitution as “to determine which areas of the economy should be opened to increased foreign participation” and to shore up economic growth,” as well support legislative measures to create a Department of Information and Communications Technology to “give appropriate focus and support to a sector that should continue to experience dynamic growth,” “a well-crafted Competition Law”, and amendments to the Build-Operate-Transfer Act to “institutionalize the big-ticket project procurement” process.

* The judiciary may also rush trial of the multiple murder case resulting from the Maguindanao massacre in which 58 persons, including 32 media workers, were killed in November 2009. As a complementary effort, the executive may initiate investigation into the unexplained wealth of the Ampatuan clan that stands accused as mastermind of the massacre.

“The case has been ongoing for more than five years” and Del Rosario notes that “it is important in terms of maintaining our people’s faith in our justice system.”

“If a crime as blatant as this is not successfully prosecuted and the perpetrators put to jail, how can we trust our judicial system?” he asked. “With this important trial proceeding at a sluggish pace, questions arise as to whether the government is exerting everything in its power to ensure a speedy and fair resolution.”

And as “a final point and challenge,” del Rosario said that “perhaps the most critical test for this administration in terms of preserving its gains is the choice of the presidential candidate who will continue the good governance and development agenda, who will enjoy the endorsement of what I still believe is a respected and popular president, and who will have the support of the administration’s political party and machinery.”

He did not make any reference to the emerging and willing top candidates of the LP, including Interior and Local Government Secretary Manuel “Mar” Roxas II, but del Rosario cited the need for Aquino to marshall his allies to consensus behind his anointed successor and avoid bringing the nation to a “two steps forward and three steps backward” situation.

“We have already had previous experience where an incumbent president was unable to gather a consensus among his allies for a winnable and worthy successor and the result was ultimately more than a decade of lost opportunities for our country,” del Rosario said, “We must not let this come to pass again.”

“I am sure,” he said, “that everyone in this room wants the Philippines to break away from our tendency to take two steps forward and three steps backward, and that effort to unchain ourselves from that trend must start right now.”

The full text of del Rosario’s speech follows:


MAKING GROWTH INCLUSIVE – PRIORITY MEASURES
OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY 2015-2016
By Ramon R. Del Rosario Jr.
Chairman, Makati Business Club

First of all, thank you for this great honor of addressing you at the fourth anniversary forum of Arangkada Philippines. Arangkada is an excellent venue for constructive dialogue, where the private sector speaks with a unified voice on specific ways by which the Philippines can further accelerate its progress, while government has the opportunity to update the business community on the tangible measures it seeks to implement towards sustained and inclusive growth.

The Aquino administration is now entering the homestretch of its term. There are now only 16 months remaining to institutionalize the much-needed and long-overdue reforms that will ensure that the considerable gains of the last four-and-a-half years will not be reversed. After all, the President himself stated in his inaugural address that he wants strong institutions to be the legacy of his term—and this is a goal that the business community wholeheartedly supports.

To give credit where it is due, the Aquino administration deserves high marks for its excellent handling of our economic fundamentals. Congratulations indeed to Secretary Purisima and the other members of the Economic Development Cluster for laying rock solid foundations for our economy even in the face of numerous natural and man-made calamities we have had to face.

The Aquino government also deserves much credit for its transparency initiatives, as we recognize the contributions that Open Data Philippines, the Budget and Customs ng Bayan webportals, and the visible online presence of the Official Gazette, among others, bring to our good governance agenda and to the development of a culture of greater transparency and accountability.

In international relations, the Aquino administration likewise deserves credit for the very principled position it has taken of insisting on resolving our maritime disputes through the rule of law, which has gained the country unprecedented admiration and respect in the community of nations. Of course, this is in addition to the excellent work being done in economic diplomacy, especially with our country’s hosting of APEC this year. The government can certainly count on the private sector’s support as we prepare for the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting later in November.

Clearly we are in much better shape today than we have been for the last 16 years. And with the growth momentum of the last three years, including the strong growth of the entire 2014, most especially the vigorous growth of the 4th quarter, we looked forward to a very dynamic 2015.

Then, 37 days ago came Mamasapano and with it, questions on whether this unfortunate tragedy would threaten to reverse all that we have achieved these past four-and-a-half years and possibly usher the country into another long period of lost opportunities and unrealized potential.

It was in this context that many of us in the business community issued a statement calling for sobriety, courage and unity. The statement appropriately expressed the business community’s utmost respect and sympathies to the families of the gallant policemen of the PNP Special Action Force, and the families of our brother Muslim Filipinos and the innocent civilians who perished in that tragic encounter.

But we noted too that in the midst of our collective grief, certain groups and individuals have called for all-out war in Mindanao, carelessly branded our fellow Muslim Filipinos as terrorists, cast doubt on the Bangsamoro Peace Process and the sincerity of our negotiators, and vigorously demanded the resignation of the President. We lamented that such brinkmanship tactics have put at risk the entire peace process, which the government and our local and international partners have painstakingly worked on for decades, and the laudable milestones that the country has achieved since 2010. Thus, we declared that we do not and will not support calls for an all-out war and for the resignation of President Aquino, as we declared our continuing support for the Bangsamoro peace process.

As we further said in our statement, political manipulation must not be allowed to take advantage of legitimate emotion and grief to the point that reason will be discarded and all the gains we have made will be undone. Rather, we appeal for sobriety, courage, and unity, as we channel our energies towards reconciliation and a genuine search for truth and justice.

In reiterating our support for the Bangsamoro Peace Process we said that there is no other alternative to guarantee the aspirations of the Bangsamoro people but total and lasting peace, and the passage of the Bangsamoro Basic Law is a crucial component in the overall strategy for peace in Mindanao. We therefore appeal to the Aquino administration and all parties involved to put the peace process back on track at the earliest time possible.

To achieve this, the complete facts surrounding the Mamasapano incident must still be satisfactorily established and the demands of justice must be served. Thus, we also call on the PNP Board of Inquiry, the Armed Forces, the MILF, the Department of Justice, and Congress to complete their investigations at the soonest time possible and render their reports to the nation. But as these inquiries are unlikely to fully satisfy the public, it is likely that President Aquino, as our Commander in Chief, will have no other recourse but to himself give the Filipino people a full accounting of the incident that lets all the chips fall where they may. Indeed, only with a full and satisfactory accounting will our common pursuit of justice be possible, and only when justice is satisfied can the peace process move forward.

While I fully support putting the peace process back on track as early as possible, with the hope of still passing the Bangsamoro Basic Law and implementing the required referendum in the next 16 months, I share the pessimism of many that the prevailing environment and the shortage of time may no longer allow all the work to be done in this limited period. But I certainly do not see this as an argument to give up on Peace in Mindanao. I see it as another reason to be very discriminating about our choice of leader in 2016!

Getting the Bangsamoro peace process back on track early is also critical in order that we as a nation can maintain the forward momentum we have gained over the past 56 months. We have much work ahead not only to institutionalize our gains, but also to fully realize the vast potentials that are now within our reach. The public and private sectors must come together to place the country on a continuous path towards progress and development and this requires an assertive effort to focus on unfinished, but certainly critical, priorities.

Let us first review our legislative priorities.

If we truly wish to institutionalize the gains of the last 56 months, the most critical among these is the Freedom of Information Bill, which I continue to hope will finally pass in the House of Representatives this year as promised by no less than Speaker Belmonte. I earlier mentioned some of the government’s transparency initiatives; however, we strongly support the FOI bill as it will institutionalize the culture of transparency and accountability that President Aquino has initiated. The first FOI bill was filed all the way back in 1987 in compliance with the Constitution. 28 years is certainly too long a time for a Constitutional mandate and a basic right to remain unrealized. The FOI bill must be passed so that our noteworthy good governance gains will be largely irreversible and sustained in subsequent administrations.

Next, I would like to strongly reiterate our call to amend the restrictive economic provisions of the Constitution as embodied in House Resolution No. 1 by Speaker Feliciano Belmonte. This amendment will give Congress the flexibility to determine which areas of the economy should be opened to increased foreign participation based on thorough deliberations from the committee level to the plenary. The Philippines is among the very few nations with specific economic restrictions lodged into its constitution, whereas a large number of countries subscribe to the principle of allowing their legislatures to determine economic policy. There is no better time than now to accelerate the process of opening up our economy as we host the annual meeting of APEC, which champions policies of open markets and enhanced investments and trade among its member economies.

We also believe that engaging in economic Charter Change will be beneficial for the medium- and long-term, especially in this period of ASEAN integration and the improved attractiveness of the Philippines as an investment destination. Significantly, greater openness in certain sectors is a prerequisite to joining high-level agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Research by Dr. Cesar Cororaton of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University said that Philippine exports are seen to rise significantly with TPP membership. Also consider that since a good number of our major trading partners, such as the United States, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam, are part of the TPP, we definitely cannot afford to be left out of this agreement and face severe handicaps in future trade with these countries.

I would also like to add my support to well publicized initiatives from business for the creation of a Department of Information and Communications Technology, which will give appropriate focus and support to a sector that should continue to experience dynamic growth. Critical also to maintain our growth momentum is a well-crafted Competition Law to promote a level playing field in our country and further improve our investment climate. Finally, we fully support the passage of the amendments to the Build-Operate-Transfer Act, which will institutionalize the PPP Center and its various mechanisms, and further strengthen the present processes in big-ticket project procurement.

Allow me now to move to the judiciary.

The Maguindanao massacre case has been ongoing for more than five years. I think this case is important in terms of maintaining our people’s faith in our justice system because if a crime as blatant as this is not successfully prosecuted and the perpetrators put to jail, how can we trust our judicial system? With this important trial proceeding at a sluggish pace, questions arise as to whether the government is exerting everything in its power to ensure a speedy and fair resolution. While this complicated case involves powerful individuals with significant resources at their disposal, there are actionable steps that can be done to expedite the cases. For instance, a prominent law dean suggested that the cases against the Ampatuans be separated and prioritized, so that these will be resolved expeditiously. Access to assets and outside communications of the accused can also be severely curtailed to prevent any further intimidation or elimination of witnesses. Certainly, innovative methods of legally and ethically speeding up the resolution of this case, as well as of the cases against former president Arroyo and the senators accused in the Napoles pork barrel scam, can be formulated. In these cases, the defense strategy to delay the proceedings in anticipation of a friendlier administration in 2016 is clear. We implore government to urgently bring all of these to a quick resolution.

Moving now to the executive branch, the most critical priority area is accelerating infrastructure development. Since 2010, we have seen the Public-Private Partnership program steadily gain steam, with about 50 projects of varying sizes in the pipeline due for implementation. By simple observation alone, the country faces a massive infrastructure gap. These mass transportation projects, expressways, seaports, and airports must be rapidly constructed with little to no blockages present.

We are, nevertheless, aware that the awarding of a contract does not guarantee its full and immediate implementation. Another set of challenges emerge after the bidding process which include right-of-way acquisition, imposition of temporary restraining orders by overly active courts, and appeals by losing bidders which are entertained by government. The effective remedy to such concerns is to strengthen our PPP and procurement framework through further refinements of the processes of the various implementing agencies and the amendment of the BOT Law earlier mentioned.

Stability in policy is also important in ensuring adequate electricity supply and price competitiveness. We maintain our position that opening up the Electric Power Industry Reform Act to amendments will result in regulatory uncertainty that may cause the deferment or cancellation of power sector investments. EPIRA aims to privatize the power industry, foster competition, and bring down power prices. The first goal has been achieved, but the critical bridge between the first and the third goal is missing. Thus, what is needed to solve our energy supply and pricing woes is the full and proper implementation of EPIRA. Besides this, investments in more base load and peaking plants must be encouraged by formulating a clear energy security and price competitiveness roadmap with specific targets and timelines—the business community is still looking for such a genuine roadmap.

Just as an aside: You may be aware that we are facing a potential gap in power supply over the next few months. There is a continuing drive for more participants in the Interruptible Load Program being implemented by Meralco, as well as the Retail Electricity Suppliers Association. I encourage corporations with substantial self-generating facilities to sign-up in this program, as well as for government to support this with a well-designed and highly practical energy conservation program. I believe the Department of Energy has already started a communications campaign on these energy conservation tips, and I hope that this will continue and gain more traction in the weeks to come.

In terms of other critical job generating sectors, we note that agriculture continues to perform below its potential. A third of our workforce is employed in agriculture, therefore it is imperative that roadmaps for specific agriculture subsectors be formulated and immediately implemented. Possible models to follow are the roadmaps of the Department of Trade and Industry for certain manufacturing industries. In addition, these roadmaps must be supported by adequate investments that will focus on increasing the productivity and welfare of both our farmers and fisherfolk.

As a final point and challenge, in an opinion article I wrote for the Inquirer last January, I mentioned that what is perhaps the most critical test for this administration in terms of preserving its gains is the choice of the presidential candidate who will continue the good governance and development agenda, who will enjoy the endorsement of what I still believe is a respected and popular president, and who will have the support of the administration’s political party and machinery. That challenge remains and is something that cannot be taken lightly.

We have already had previous experience where an incumbent president was unable to gather a consensus among his allies for a winnable and worthy successor and the result was ultimately more than a decade of lost opportunities for our country. We must not let this come to pass again. I am sure that everyone in this room wants the Philippines to break away from our tendency to take two steps forward and three steps backward, and that effort to unchain ourselves from that trend must start right now.

Ladies and gentlemen, these are just a few of the unfinished priorities that the business community believes will greatly assist us in our shared goal of inclusive growth through job generation, poverty reduction, and global competitiveness. The country is facing a great test brought about by the Mamasapano incident. Nevertheless, this brings with it a choice that we must collectively make as a nation: to unite and work together towards our common aspiration of a progressive Philippines, with peace reigning in the conflict areas in the South, with institutions that are strong and politically mature, and with an inclusive economy that gives every Filipino a fair shot at improving his or her lot in life.

Four Arangkada Forums have already been held. It will definitely be a shame if we enter the fifth Arangkada Forum and a large number of these recommendations, which have garnered the consensus of almost all the major business groups in the country, remain unimplemented. The time to vigorously pursue these reforms is now and we in the Philippine Business Groups and Joint Foreign Chambers are ready and willing to work more closely with government during the endgame phase of this administration.

ARMM: Stodgy, ill-starred stats

NO SAFE WATER and toilets in homes mostly not powered by electricity. Far fewer doctors and health facilities care for their babies and mothers. They die up to 10 years earlier than most Filipinos across the nation.

Yet still, the people of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) have had to flee their homes incessantly on account of intermittent clashes between soldiers and armed groups.

ARMM, home to 3,256,140 Filipinos as of the 2010 census, is a stodgy record of ill-starred stats.

As of 2011, of the 455 waterless municipalities in the country, 94 are in the five provinces of ARMM, according to the Philippine Institute for Development Studies’ repot titled “Water Financing Programs in the Philippines: Are We Making Progress?”

These 94 waterless towns of ARMM come from the region’s five provinces — 36 in Lanao del Sur, 20 in Maguindanao, 16 in Sulu, 11 in Tawi-Tawi, and 11 in Basilan.

More detailed official data as of 2003 showed that 8 of 10 people in Tawi-Tawi, 7 of 10 in Basilan and Sulu, five of 10 in Maguindanao and 4 of 10 in Lanao del Sur did not have access to improved water sources.

The number of households with access to safe water supply as of 2007 revealed that of Marawi City’s 26,009 households, only 5,064 have access to safe water supply (19%), and only 13,400 or half the households have sanitary toilets.

Electricity also remains a scarce public good in ARMM. While 40 percent of Lanao del Sur’s population had power as of 2007, people located elsewhere in ARMM continue to linger in the dark, literally. Up to 63 percent of the people in Basilan; 76 percent in Maguindanao; and 83 percent in both Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, hade no electricity as of that year.

By another index, the number of rural health units or RHUs in the nation as of 2011, ARMM fares just as poorly. Of the 2,314 RHUs in the Philippines, only 119 are in ARMM – 42 in Lanao del Sur, 33 in Maguindanao, 19 in Sulu, 13 in Basilan, and 12 in Tawi-Tawi, according to the Department of Health.

The number of district and provincial hospitals in ARMM presents a picture just as lean and bad – the Philippines has 584 district hospitals and 89 provincial hospitals. However, the slice of the pie that goes to ARMM is a pithy 24 district hospitals and two provincial hospitals, or one each in Sulu and Tawi-Tawi. None exists as yet for the provinces of Maguindanao, Basilan, and Lanao del Sur.

In terms of the latest infant mortality rate data, the National Statistical Coordination Board reported that in the Philippines, an average 23 babies per 100,000 population die each year before reaching age 5 as of 2006. The figure for ARMM was much more at 33.

The proportion of children under a year old who had been immunized against measles stood at 81 percent across the nation in 2003. The ARMM figure is much lower at 76.9.

When mothers give birth, attendance and care by skilled health personnel would be most safe and ideal, In the Philippines as of 2006, seven in 10 or 70.1 percent of mothers giving birth got this service as of 2006. In ARMM, only 49.1 percent or less than five in 10 got the service.

But the sorriest number of all pertains to the life expectancy of men and women in ARMM. As of the latest 2000 data, across the nation, Filipino males live up to 66.11 years, and Filipino females, up to 71.64 years, according to the Philippine Statistical Authority.

In ARMM, Filipinos die five to 10 years younger, however. Life expectancy among males in the ARMM provinces is much, much shorter. In Maguindanao, life expectancy is at 60.3 years for males, and 61.65 for females; in Sulu, 56.97 and 58.53; in Tawi-Tawi, 56.13 and 57.5; in Lanao del Sur, 61.87 and 62.74; and in Basilan, 61.and 67.43.

As of the 2010 census, the National Statistics Office said ARMM’s 3.25-million population consists of 293,322 people in Basilan, 933,260 in Lanao del Sur,
944,718 in Maguindanao, 718,290 in Sulu, and 366,550 in Tawi-Tawi. – With research and reporting by fernando Cabigao Jr. and Jaileen F. Jimeno, PCIJ, March 2015

When politicians wed in style: Simple living, lavish partying

WHEN POLITICIANS WED, it almost always seems like they throw all caution to the wind and forget about how they are supposed to comport themselves as public officials. They should, according to the Constitution and the law, live by some principles, not least of them these two: Lead simple lives and avoid conflict of interest situations.

The upscale wedding of Sen. Francis Joseph G. Escudero and actress Heart Evangelista (baptized as Love Marie Ongpauco) on Feb. 15, 2015 was just the latest in a series of grand political unions.

Check out the Files of FRANCIS JOSEPH ‘CHIZ’ G. ESCUDERO on PCIJ’s MONEY POLITICS ONLINE:

Public Profiles
Campaign Finance
Public Funds

Escudero, of course, was not the first politician to have shown he is given to excess when it comes to marrying.

On Oct. 27, 2009, then Senator Manuel “Mar” Roxas II exchanged wedding vows with broadcast journalist Korina Sanchez at Santo Domingo Church in Quezon City. More than 10 bishops and priests officiated the ceremony attended by about 3,000 people, and before a crowd of spectators outside the church.

On Jan. 22, 2012, then Valenzuela City Councilor Shalani Soledad, one of the former girlfriends of President Aquino, tied the knot with Pasig City Representative Roman Romulo in glamor and style at St. Benedict Church in Sta. Rosa, Laguna. Some of those prominent and powerful from politics and business attended, too.

But at the Escudero-Evangelista nuptials, no less than President Benigno S. Aquino III was enrolled as best man, although pressing affairs of state prevented him from attending the ceremony. The two men have been chummy since their days as members both of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

For starters, the Escudero-Evangelista gig was held at the Balesin Island Club, an exclusive, members-only resort in Polillo, Quezon province. Alphaland Corp. developed the resort; its chairman and chief executive officer, Roberto V. Ongpin, also stood as one of the principal wedding sponsors.

Two lavish wedding receptions were held for the couple and their guests – the first on Balesin Island and the second, three days later, at the high-end Blue Leaf Filipinas in Aseana City in Parañaque City.

The groom and bride would not disclose how much they’ve spent on the wedding and the receptions. Escudero would only say that they spent only what they could afford.

Suggestions that the wedding had locked him in a conflict of interest situation on account of some sponsors from big corporate entities, Escudero had been quoted in an ABS-CBN news report as saying: “Tatayuan ko ano ang tingin kong tama at lalabanan ko ano ang tingin kong mali. Anumang conflict, ang importante dinedeklara iyon para kung ano man ang posisyon mo sa isang bagay, maliwanag at alam ng publiko (I will stand by what I think is right and fight what I think is wrong. What’s important is to declare any conflict so that whatever your position is on anything is clear to the public}.

Numerous sponsors were drafted into the wedding, because, Escudero explained, “siguro kasi sa larangan ng showbiz ang napangasawa ko kaya maraming sponsors kaugnay sa bagay na iyon (Maybe we had many sponsors because my wife is in showbiz).”

A lawyer by profession, it is unusual that Escudero seems to make light of the relevant provisions of the Constitution and the law.
Under Section 4 of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6713 or the “Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees,” public officials and their families are supposed to live simply and modestly and “to not indulge in extravagant or ostentatious display of wealth in any form.”

Then, too, how Escudero managed to bankroll such a grand wedding is not clear. In his 2013 Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth or SALN, he declared a net worth of only P8.243 million, including = cash of only P3.183 million.

The roster of wedding sponsors are an evident trigger of a conflict of interest situation for Escudero. Such conflict, the law and jurisprudence say, could be either real, perceived, or potential.

Apart from Roberto V. Ongpin of Alphaland, the other sponsors who saw Escudero wed Evangelista were the other top guns of Philippine business — Ramon S. Ang of San Miguel Corp. a food-infrastructure conglomerate; Fernando Zobel de Ayala of the Ayala Group of Companies that is into retail, telecommunication, and real estate ventures; Lance Y. Gokongwei of JG Summit Holdings, a food-retail-property-retail-airline combine; Hans T. Sy of the SM Group of Companies, a property and mall developer; and Andrew L. Tan of the property developer Megaworld Corp. Then, too, the couple had sponsors from among the top executives of the television networks ABS-CBN, GMA-7, as well as Viva Entertainment Inc.

Indeed, while he had said that having many sponsors was largely on account of his wife’s job as an actress, the couple’s longer list of sponsors from business and politics seemed to have been hinged more on Escudero’s job as a politician.

From the world of politics, those who attended as wedding sponsors included Sen. Grace Poe; Adelbert W. Antonino, former mayor of General Santos City; lawyer Gilberto M. Duavit Sr., former representative of the first district of the province of Rizal; Faustino S. Dy Jr., former governor of the province of Isabela; and Esther E. Hamor, mayor of Casiguran town in Escudero’s home province of Sorsogon.

Some of the bills that Escudero has filed as a legislator offer clues to how he has engaged with some of these sponsors.

For instance, Escudero was the principal author in the senate of R.A. No. 9649, an act amending the charter of General Santos City, that was signed into law on July 7, 2009.

In August 2010, the local government of General Santos City had cited R.A. 9649 as a ground for the filing of administrative and criminal charges against the officials of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) and the Register of Deeds for issuing an ancestral land title to the Bansalao-Banisil family of the B’laan tribe.

In a MindaNews report, former city Mayor Darlene Magnolia Antonino-Custodio, daughter of Adelbert Antonino, pointed out that under the amended city charter, proper consultations with the local government is needed before NCIP can issue a Certificate of Ancestral Land Title. (Like Escudero, Darlene Custodio had also served in the House of Representatives.)

For another, Escudero has also filed Senate Bill (S.B) No. 2104, which aims to amend Batas Pambansa Bilang 68 or the “Corporation Code of the Philippines” and allow a one-person corporation. Under the current law, at least five but not more than 15 persons are needed to form a private corporation.

Also as a senator, Escudero filed S.B. 2449, which seeks to amend the National Internal Revenue Code to lengthen the period for qualified VAT-registered individuals to apply for claims for refunds and tax credits.

Meanwhile, the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee is currently investigating a property deal between the Boy Scout of the Philippines (BSP) and property developer Alphaland Corp. whose chairman and CEO is Roberto V. Ongpin, an Escudero wedding sponsor.

The Senate had summoned Ongpin to explain the agreement between BSP and Alphaland on the development of the BSP’s one-hectare property in Makati City.

Then, too, two of Escudero’s wedding sponsors, Ramon S. Ang and Gilberto Duavit Sr., had also served as Escudero’s election campaign donors in 2007.

Ang, president and chief operating officer of San Miguel Corp., had donated P9 million to Escudero on his first run for the Senate in 2007. Duavit, a former politician and former chairman of the Republic Broadcasting System (now GMA Network, Inc.), gave Escudeor P1 million in campaign contribution, also in 2007. – Fernando Cabigao Jr., PCIJ, February 2015